A federal jury in Louisiana on Wednesday acquitted a white state trooper charged with violating the civil rights of a Black motorist despite body-camera footage that showed the officer pummeling the man 18 times with a flashlight.

  • style99@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brown still faces state charges in the violent arrest of yet another Black motorist, a case in which he boasted in a group chat with other troopers that “it warms my heart knowing we could educate that young man.”

    To be continued…

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    After a three-day trial in Monroe, jurors found Brown not guilty of depriving Aaron Bowman of his civil rights during a 2019 beating that left Bowman with a broken jaw, broken ribs and a gash to his head.

    The acquittal comes as federal prosecutors are still scrutinizing other Louisiana state troopers caught on body-camera video punching, stunning and dragging another Black motorist, Ronald Greene, before he died in their custody on a rural roadside. That federal probe is also examining whether police brass obstructed justice to protect the troopers who beat Greene following a high-speed chase.

    • Fredselfish @lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me guess the jury was made up of a mostly white male jury?

      Exactly how did he get aquiitted. These fucking states are si fucking racist you can’t get a fair trail there unless your white.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They probably expected to lose this one only to appeal immediately and hope appeals knows their ass from their elbow.

        • FlowVoid
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I doubt it, since prosecutors generally cannot appeal a verdict of not guilty.

            • FlowVoid
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The citizen can’t appeal either. Prosecutors are in charge of a criminal case, not citizens.

                • FlowVoid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  This wasn’t a civil case. This was a criminal case. Depriving someone of their civil rights is a federal crime. The officer was prosecuted by Brandon Brown.

                  U.S. Attorney Brandon Brown, who is not related to Jacob Brown, told AP he was proud of the 48-year-old Bowman for having the courage to tell his story.

                  “These cases are arguably the toughest that we investigate and prosecute,” he said. “We believe that this victim’s civil rights were violated. Unfortunately for us the jury didn’t agree, and we’ll have to respect their decision.”

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let me guess the jury was made up of a mostly white male jury?

        Here comes the story of the Hurricane.

      • dartos@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The lawyers on both sides have influence on who gets into the jury. If the jury had such an overwhelming bias, then the lawyers are to blame…. As always

          • dartos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never said they did.

            they choose who to exclude. They have influence on the jury selection.

            • Zaktor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can’t exclude your way to having a representative jury. If the opposing side strikes all/most of the black people, none of your strike choices can make the jury more black.

              Why Is It So Easy for Prosecutors to Strike Black Jurors?

              There are no comprehensive statistics on how often prosecutors strike jurors based on race, but there is little doubt that the practice remains common, especially in the South. In Caddo Parish, Louisiana, prosecutors struck forty-eight per cent of qualified black jurors between 1997 and 2009 and only fourteen per cent of qualified whites, according to a review by the Louisiana Capital Assistance Center. In Jefferson Parish, where a quarter of the population is black, the split was even greater—fifty-five per cent to sixteen per cent—so that twenty-two per cent of felony trials between 1994 and 2002 had no black jurors.

              • dartos@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, but you can exclude your way to having a non representative jury… which happens very often.

                • Zaktor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Your original statement was that the lawyers on both sides have influence. Which they do, but only one side is responsible for all white juries. It’s not a failure of the other side for allowing that to happen.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how many people will act surprised when the next protests will end up even more violent.

    • quindraco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      For starters, let’s be clear: Jacob Brown committed battery, a violation of Louisiana state law. This case is about an alleged violation of Federal law and simply isn’t a battery case. That means it’s not as cut and dry as “we have this guy on video committing battery with a flashlight, of course he’s guilty”.

      This is what Jacob Brown was charged with violating: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242

      So if you want to claim this case is open and shut or cut and dry, you need to point to some element of that law Jacob violated and then explain how it’s so obvious he violated that element.

      My first guess, and to be clear, I am speculating, is that they tried to prove Jacob battered Aaron because Aaron was black. That means proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Jacob doesn’t simply beat everyone up, which is very difficult to prove, especially since so many cops genuinely do simply beat everyone up.

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a federal case so all the filings and judicial decisions are up on pacer of anyone feels like looking.

    • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Systemic issues. The problem is that the jury is probably correct that under current Louisiana laws this pig did nothing wrong technically. We all know it’s fucked up but we’ve allowed our laws to be shaped by the people who abuse them.

      • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whether he broke the law or not is completely irrelevant. 9 times out of 10, a jury in Louisiana is going to be composed of white racists who will always side with a white cop, because that’s the primary demographic of the state.