(This post is referring to tiktok, instagram reels, youtube shorts type content)

So it’s no secret that for half a decade now we’ve had short form video content get increasingly popularised. To the point where your uncle probably watches them on some platform and so does your 6 year old.

Now in terms of addictiveness, privacy falling through the roof, advertising down your throat, etc. we’ve reached new records. But that isn’t what this post is about.

I never used this format much, except in 2020 during the pandemic, but I can’t help but notice when I do. Even if I make a brand new VPN’d account for it. Every 5-10th post or so wil be some kind of culture war propaganda.

The kind of stuff that made me an edgy right wing bigot as a teenager because I got influenced by it on youtube. Luckily, I grew and changed. Unfortunately, many former friends, not so much.

On a completely new account you’ll get bombarded with videos like:

  • “This is why women NEED real MEN”
  • “How to piss of a cyclist”
  • ”If a climate activist is blocking the road, you should be allowed to run over them”
  • ”When MEN were thrown a grenade, they reacted quickly, WOMEN got confused and scared. That’s why we NEED men in the army”
  • Wholesome looking video — homophobic caption: “This is why children need both a mum and a dad”

These are all examples I got today when I decided to make completely new accounts on a new device with a VPN. I tried youtube shorts and tiktok for this and scrolled 20ish videos on each without liking anything.

It scares me how much there is a strong rightward shift amongst the younger population. To the point where 18-24’s in recent german elections have voted the most for the borderline neo-nazi AFD party. I know these parties are by far the most active and very popular on tiktok.

I know to some people these examples might seem anoying but trivial. But you are forgetting how impressionable children and teenagers are. There really is this thing called the alt-right pipeline. One very specific example which impacted me at a younger age, was you start with “mad karen” type videos, then after a couple you get recommended “mad SJW” videos, I think you see where I’m going with this, after a while you’re on “feminism debunked” and watching peterson/crowder/shapiro. I know many childhood friends who went down this pipeline and became insufferably racist bigot adults.

I wonder what others think on this?

  • Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be fair, alt-right content is present in all types of medias: short videos, but also tweets, articles, long videos, essays, etc.

    The fake Facebook groups created by Russia to antagonize two local groups did not need shorts videos to succeed: https://www.npr.org/2017/11/01/561427876/how-russia-used-facebook-to-organize-two-sets-of-protesters

    If you look at Twitter nowadays, the “For you” is going to be more or less what you listed above

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll second this. The poison is in everything.

      Birth of a Nation was a theatrical full length feature film.

      I don’t use TicToc, but it’s not the cause.

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Never claimed it was the cause, but from my perspective, and from the trends I’m noticing, it seems to be far more prevalent there.

        I don’t get bombarded with that stuff if I create a new account on basically any other service but those.

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re completely right. But somehow, I feel like it’s mostly escapable on most formats, except the short form video type one, as you rely entirely on an algorithm.

      • Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        except the short form video type one, as you rely entirely on an algorithm.

        Facebook, Twitter, even Reddit nowadays promote a certain type of content (reaction inducing), so unfortunately it’s not only shorts

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Again, correct, but you still custimise your feed to large extent by following stuff.

          Although you can follow people on tiktok and stuff, your feed is almost entirely predetermined by how you interact with content, ie. how long you stayed on certain videos, what you liked, what made you close the app, etc.

          • Servais (il/le)@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            you still custimise your feed to large extent by following stuff.

            I’m not that familiar with the latest versions of the three I listed, but I’ve seen quite a few complaints on Reddit recently who seems to be pushing irrelevant content just for rage bait.

            Also the things you mentioned about tracking are there on Twitter too:

            Twitter’s privacy policy states they use the information collected to: “improve and personalise our products and services so that you have a better experience on Twitter, including by showing you more relevant content and ads, suggesting people and topics to follow, enabling and helping you discover affiliates, third-party apps, and services.”

            It’s important to note that opting out of Twitter’s interest-based ads doesn’t necessarily mean you won’t see targeted advertising. For example, you may still see ads which are based on information such as what you Tweet, who you follow and the links you click on Twitter.

            Often while browsing, if Twitter recognises that you’re interacting with something repeatedly, they will offer for you to follow that particular topic – which can be anything from celebrities to sports teams.

            https://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/tech/what-does-twitter-know-about-you-and-your-data-how-to-see-everything-twitter-thinks-about-you-4125827

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alt-right fuckos have unfortunately been targeting impressionable kids for decades now.

    Tiktok is just where the kids are today, a few years ago it was the YouTube alt-right pipeline and before that it was basically just weirdos on 4chan

    That’s not to say it’s not alarming or something to drag your friends away from, but it’s not new and it’s not going away.

    No one rational can possibly support their ideology, so they need to find easily manipulated people to dupe in order to remain relevant.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve somehow managed to completely miss all of that. I rarely see any right wing content anywhere. I almost never watch videos filmed in portrait rather than landscape. Maybe that has saved me?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I watch lots of gun related content on YouTube, no right-wing crap to be seen. Guess they know me?

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Same here for the most part. Every now and then I’ll see something recommended that may be on the edge but I’m not clicking it to find out.

        I should note that I’m not talking about shorts so I guess I’m off topic here. They wouldn’t stop nagging me so installed a plugin to permanently hide it :)

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m the same way. I’m still on twitter and there’s no such content on my feed except for the occasional post that gets thru. I simply mute those accounts and if it was a retweet I either unfollow the user or turn of retweets from them. It’s not like that’s being forced down my throat. In my experience social media algorithms do listen to the users and when you tell it you’re not interested in something it stops feeding you that.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    My hot take on this is that the algorithm is working as intended. I don’t think there’s a secret agenda behind it, and even if there was, it would likely skew left due to the nature of tech companies. The algorithm is simply trying to maximize engagement, and certain kinds of content do that better than others. People might feel like they’re being served content they don’t like, but I think they’re actually drawn to that content despite not liking. It’s like driving past a car wreck; you know it’s not good, and you might see something you wish you didn’t, but you still look.

    I actively block content from my feed using word filters. I’ve decided I no longer want to see posts about certain things, so I block them. However, every now and then, a post on one of these topics manages to evade my content filters. And what do I do? I click on it and make a comment, getting myself into hot water again. I know I shouldn’t, and I’ve even taken active steps to stop myself, but I still do.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree and I wish I knew how to stop it or counter it for larger numbers of people.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Homie clicking alt right stuff.

    I should be targeted, based on demographics. I don’t see any of this shit. Don’t click the bait. We learned this in the 90s.

    CLICK HERE

    DOWNLOAD NOW

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every time my wife gets mad at a video, I remind her the only reason she is seeing it is because she’s watched similar videos before, so it thinks she wants more. If she didn’t rage-watch, it wouldn’t show her more.

  • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Greedy rich distracting us with culture war to avoid a class war. Russia, China, North Korea trying to sow discord. Conclusion: Make lying illegal. Tax billionaires to extinction to avoid societal collapse.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m guessing the content offering algorithms are looking at your IP, browser profile, etc. and throwing stuff at you that it assumes you and “people in your area” want to see. Even with brand new accounts, they always try to figure this stuff out. It often gets it wrong, but that never stops them from trying.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Out of curiosity do you see similar results without the VPN? A well known VPN provider might already be flagged to show certain types of content.

    Of course that’s all secondary since this is a problem with most of these services (and not just short form content). I don’t see a situation where we can ensure people don’t see this sort of content. Plus it would be impossible to properly categorize “good” vs “bad”. I think you’ve just got to make sure that the opposing content is available and that friends/family can help direct people. People who found their way in need to find their way out, but they can have help.

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I had noticed this trend in the past few years. And recently I got a completely new device so I thought that’s a perfect blank slate, without all the who knows how trackable device stuff and cache and everything to test it on, so I set up just vpn on my current location, windscribe VPN; and got those results. But I get similar ones without VPN too.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s good(?) to know. I asked because I didn’t get those results, I got stupid food, Harris/Trump stuff, kids dancing and obvious ads. Who knows with algorithm stuff how they decide to start.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I didn’t read this post because it is way too long. Please make a short ten to twenty second video summering your points but make sure it’s also funny or I’ll get bored and swipe.

  • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Offtopic but this reminds me of a Shorts channel I randomly subscribed to, and then I see him posting a video criticising Hollywood’s casting.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    it’s a problem that normal, responsible adults immediatly know these apps are problematic or at least a waste of time. this creates a loop making them more problematic and shitty every iteration.