Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., repeatedly suggested a leading Arab American activist is a Hamas supporter when she testified Tuesday at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on hate crimes, and he told her she should hide her “head in a bag.”

The activist, Maya Berry, said repeatedly that she did not support Hamas and was “disappointed” by the minuteslong exchange toward the end of a hearing called “A Threat to Justice Everywhere: Stemming the Tide of Hate Crimes in America.”

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    We need to take away their congressional representation until they finally start following the post-civil war amendments.

    150 years is enough.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sadly the post-civil war amendments include a provision that allows prisoners to be used for unpaid labor.

      From the text of the 13th amendment:

      Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

      Only argument is if the party has been “duly” convicted, which is a recurring issue we see with the US justice system.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Again, great.

        First, they have to start following the amendment as written, and we can pass an amendment to outlaw involuntary servitude as punishment for crimes.

        But that’s 1 clause from a ton of amendments they refuse to follow, in fact Mississippi STILL REFUSES to retify the 24th amendment, and has voted to reject it outright.

        Until they sort their shit out, no representative for the fuckers.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Technically it doesn’t legalize it, it just avoids the criminalization of it. This is significant because it makes it much easier to reform (which is how around half of states have reformed it at least a little), and this combined with the fact that most states lack significant reforms tells you a lot.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think the text is pretty direct about permitting it. If it is listed as an exception to that which shall not exist, then it is explicitly allowed to exist.

          It’s not a de-facto exception by omission, it is named as permissable within the text of the amendment.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sure, but also worth noting that some prisons are federally run, a state wouldn’t have the jurisdiction to ban something that the fed controls. That is why reform needs to come from the top, not just at the state level.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Great!

        Let’s update that as well!

        And again, the south can get representation back as soon as they start following the constitution.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The problem with the 2nd amendment isn’t that it wasn’t updated, it’s that it was.

            The 14th amendment incorporated the other amendments such that they did not only restrict the power of the federal government upon the states and citizens, as the founders intended, but also restricted the states (so you couldn’t have southern states being evil to their citizens).

            But the 2nd amendment was incorporated radically under Heller, when it should have been incorporated in a more moderate way, such that regulations were possible, within reason, not the wild-west that Heller imposed.

            The 13th should have been reinterpreted by the courts such that many of our current forms of incarcerated service were considered beyond the line and became de facto slavery, particularly when imposed by southern states as they were.