Four more large Internet service providers told the US Supreme Court this week that ISPs shouldn’t be forced to aggressively police copyright infringement on broadband networks.

While the ISPs worry about financial liability from lawsuits filed by major record labels and other copyright holders, they also argue that mass terminations of Internet users accused of piracy “would harm innocent people by depriving households, schools, hospitals, and businesses of Internet access.” The legal question presented by the case “is exceptionally important to the future of the Internet,” they wrote in a brief filed with the Supreme Court on Monday.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    imagine getting banned from the one monopoly ISP available to you in your entire city. what do you do after that? sell your house?

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I actually just use my phone for internet and haven’t had a landline ISP for 2 years now.

      Visible, $25/month has saved me so much money and they even sent me a free phone.

    • KellysNokia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      puts on fake moustache “Hello I am new to the area and would like to procure one internet please.”