I get the usage as a dig at do nothing office jobs, but what are these jobs really? I’ve never worked in an office or known anyone who did well enough to ask.

So what are these jobs actually like? How do they exist in the first place? Could I lie my way into getting one lol?

  • chickentendrils [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Like project manager, scrum master. That kind of shit is what I think of. They exist because technical people and upper management don’t interface well typically, obviously those management jobs are also more or less email jobs but they’re rarer.

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, what does a project manager do? I have a real hard time imagining what anyone does in these “office” type jobs (i imagine many of them are remote now, but i don’t know what else to call them lol)

      • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I can speak to scrum master, I was one for a while. On a programming team you have a bunch of devs who ideally wouldn’t do any work and management (a project manager?, a “product” guy, etc) who wants to get as much work as possible out of the devs. The scrum master is supposed to help them reach a compromise: a limited amount of work, with a reasonable amount of flexibility in when it’s done, but on a wider scale it is legible and predictable to management so that they can make business plans. To this end the scrum master runs planning meetings and helps break development work down into sensible tasks, the length/difficulty of which can be roughly estimated. If you don’t have a scrum master, management is constantly making impossible requests, asking the team to do 180 degree turns, etc., and also it’s really hard to estimate software progress so basically nothing gets done on schedule and everyone is mad all the time. In effect it’s a limited-mandate negotiation job on behalf of the developers.

        In my opinion this is not an email job, but maybe at large companies with more opaque management it is. /u/chickentendrils is spot-on about why it exists.

          • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            no clue, never had one. I’ve had some friends who did logistics(?) work that seemed to be mostly emails. One that worked at wind turbine company, her job seemed to be mostly emailing vendor fairs to make sure that they could set up a booth there. No idea what her job title was.

            Graeber’s Bullshit Jobs (book not essay) presumably has some examples since it’s the source of this line of thought. I haven’t read it

      • blipblip [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        My boss is also my project manager, most of what she does is function as a sort of go between for us (the people on the ground actually providing the service) and the customer. That involves sitting in meetings with the customer higher ups to keep them in the loop on how things are going, bringing any issues that are preventing us from getting something done to them to make a decision on, figuring out the logistics of how something is going to get done, things like that.

        Basically she deals with the people bullshit so all I have to do is go out and fix the problems.

  • Beaver [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s the coordination work. Project management, accounting, purchasing, compliance, etc, is about figuring out what the hell is going on, and what the hell should be done. When an organization reaches certain thresholds of complexity, a lot of labor needs to be spent on those kind of activities, or else the whole operation of the organization seizes up.

    The day to day varies, but spending all day updating spreadsheets and sending emails is common. A lot of them are bullshit, and only exist to fight fires that other parts of the organization are lighting. Many are complex and require extensive training to do, but most can probably be done by someone who just lied on their resume. They are physically cushy, and often pay better than manual labor or standing-up jobs (but not always, especially not the ones that don’t require any credentials).

  • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    These jobs are largely just people “knowing” what a bunch of other people are doing so they can coordinate the labor between all of them and is specialized paperwork/administrative/inter-team communications labor so that the other types of specialized labor (factory, accounting, engineering, etc.) dont have to spend time on it

    You could definitely lie your way into one if you learn all the lingo, and look/speak/act like a typical corporate drone

    These jobs are ridiculed cause the most important aspects are generally just acting professional, understand classist jargon, and being prompt with responding to emails/messages.

    Versus other bullshit office jobs that actually require knowledge or skills like accounting, HR, legal, finance etc.

  • Leon_Grotsky [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Speaking for myself, what I largely do is logistics. I am coordinating shipments between facilities and that mostly looks like sending information back and forth from one party to another.

    Something I haven’t seen mentioned yet is sometimes these jobs are created because of “permissions” issues.

    For example, you don’t want someone who both creates and confirms purchase orders for accountability reasons.