• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Your argument that other people are engaging in black and white thinking when you take the position that the possibility of injustice makes justice unobtainable is funny.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure: you disregard this specific case and only bring up other hypothetical cases to prove why this is unjust. Like you just did in the comment I replied to.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, it’s a black and white position. You specifically are saying the state is unable to obtain justice because of the “risk”. You preclude the possibility of justice being obtained. I’m pretty amazed you can find so many ways to say the same thing and not realize that. But hey, I’m sure it’s just everybody else being irrational right?

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  This is how people figure out how each other think, calm down.

                  It does seem you are saying governments shouldnt be permitted to seek justice against misinformation because doing so puts a greater injustice on the public as a whole.

                  Thats me rephrasing your point from earlier to see if I understand it right, so if I have it wrong feel free to explain.

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  So… After being asked by multiple people to clarify your position, you’re not going to after all?