• pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My comment was simply pointing out how Germany’s been involved in genocide at least twice in modern history.

    I’d appreciate if someone would challenge me with a sound argument rather than censoring me.

    • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Your comment was literally just “What is it with Germans and genocide?” Besides the one interpretation you suggest, there are a lot of other possibilities.

      In any case, if a thread had started from your comment, do you think it could have been a productive one?

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Okay, let’s just say I’m that dense. How else would you interpret my comment? How unproductive would the thread be?

        • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          E.g. “It must be a genetic thing” or “Gee, they just have a genocidal culture” or …

          The way you phrased it also suggests the direction the discussion will go: It’s not going to be about genocides, it’s going to be anti-German, although genocides are unfortunately fairly common among humans. (Of course, “genocide” is a somewhat mushy politically-applied term as well which doesn’t help.)

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’d understand the thread as author intended. Just my 5 cents. And honestly, it’s time to talk openly about it, even though the thread could diverge - in that case, weed the offensive comments, not censor beforehand.