Time is running out for Kamala Harris to break with Biden on the Gaza catastrophe | Moira Donegan
www.theguardian.com
Biden’s approach to Israel has been disastrous, both morally and strategically – and it could cost Harris dearly
  • Max@lemmy.world
    1·
    2 months ago

    I understand that you have principles. I have principles too. But it sounds like your principles are at least partly based on a personal purity, which is what I’m arguing against.

    The idea that by voting for kamala, you’ll be personally tainted by her actions. And that by not voting at all, you avoid this taint.

    There’s a good argument in my opinion for not voting if you actually believe it will lead to the best outcome. Like for example that if enough people don’t vote it will cause our leader/parties/etc to do something better. I just don’t think this is true. And if it’s not true, what remains is a purity argument, which I find selfish, since it prioritizes your internal view of yourself over what happens to other people in the world.

    I’m also absolutely in favor of third party candidates that push issues and the electorate to the left. I just think that generally they should drop out at the point when it becomes clear that they aren’t going to win and endorse the person closest to them on the issues.

    • sandbox@lemmy.world
      1·
      2 months ago

      By voting for Kamala, you are expressly supporting her, and by extension, you are expressly supporting genocide. You can play all the rhetorical tricks you want, but that doesn’t change the reality of the decision you’re making.

      If you can tolerate that, then we have different principles. I will never support genocide. If that means that my vote is worthless, then so be it.

      If the will of the people can no longer be expressed through the democratic process, then the process is not democratic. It’s a farce, a performance designed to make you think that you can influence policy.

      What we really need is revolution.