“Passkeys,” the secure authentication mechanism built to replace passwords, are getting more portable and easier for organizations to implement thanks to new initiatives the FIDO Alliance announced on Monday.

  • unskilled5117@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    The lock-in effect of passkeys is something that this protocol aims to solve though. The “only managed by your device” is what keeps us locked in, if there is no solution to export and import it on another device.

    The protocol aims to make it easy to import and export passkeys so you can switch to a different provider. This way you won’t be stuck if you create passkeys e.g. on an Apple device and want to switch to e.g. Bitwarden or an offline password manager like KeyPassXC

    The specifications are significant for a few reasons. CXP was created for passkeys and is meant to address a longstanding criticism that passkeys could contribute to user lock-in by making it prohibitively difficult for people to move between operating system vendors and types of devices. […] CXP aims to standardize the technical process for securely transferring them between platforms so users are free […].

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And who forces all the corps to correctly implement that protocol? Getting you locked in is in all of their interests, after all.

      • unskilled5117@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I think it‘s fair to remain skeptical but the big organizations were part of the development, so there seems to be some interest. And it‘s not always in their interest to lock users in, when it also prevents users from switching to their platform.

        Development of technical standards can often be a fraught bureaucratic process, but the creation of CXP seems to have been positive and collaborative. Researchers from the password managers 1Password, Bitwarden, Dashlane, NordPass, and Enpass all worked on CXP, as did those from the identity providers Okta as well as Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and SK Telecom.

    • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      That’s between platforms though. I like my stuff self-managed. Unless it provenly works with full offline solutions I’ll remain sceptical.

      • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I like my stuff self-managed.

        Bitwarden / Vaultwarden is a popular available working solution for self-hosting and self-managing passkeys (as well as passwords).

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      not the first time i hear this though. im skeptical until proven otherwise