• stravanasu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The current security philosophy almost seems to be: “In order to make it secure, make it difficult to use”. This is why I propose to go a step further: “In order to make it secure, just don’t make it”. The safest account is the one that doesn’t exist or that can’t be accessed by anyone, including its owner.

  • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I use a password manager with passkey support and still disabled all my passkeys. The user experience for passkeys is so much worse even when support exists.

    • ericjmorey@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’d like to hear more about the specifics if the issues you ran into. I keep delaying my options to start using passkeys because it’s a lot to take in at once and the only services implementing them seem to be the most important ones that I really don’t want to experiment with my ability to acess them. I haven’t even been looking at the details of each service’s implementation.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Using a security key as a password manager passkey seems to resolve this issue (I think?), but I guess the issue is more a problem for the casual user who wouldn’t bother with a security key!

    • ericjmorey@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Can you elaborate on what it means to use a security key as a password manager? I’m not sure if I understand what you mean.