• TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    He’s been allowed to get away with violating the first amendment for awhile though. It’s no wonder he’s trying to here. The whole disney vendetta started because they openly opposed a law they wanted to pass. Not much more first amendment than that.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      In particular the ones taking the side of the Brazilian government against musk.

      Brazil doesn’t have USA’s First Amendment. So no matter which stance people have on what it should be, it was legally valid.

      And the whole fight was a political farce as Musk personally is known to comply with government censorship. Again, you can argue that the law is wrong and should be changed, but it’s legally valid.

        • ggppjj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What would a liberal who doesn’t dispose of their values look like in this situation?

          I do mean this question sincerely, if possible please try to avoid the easy non-answer of “That doesn’t exist hahahahahahahahah”.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except you can’t threaten a president or lie about a corporation without being sued.

      However, the right to incite racial violence is very much protected

      Funny that huh?

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is true, and the 2nd Amendment exists for when they start saying Nazi shit.