• t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think you may have misunderstood the purpose of this tool.

    It doesn’t read the deeds, make a decision, and submit them for termination all on its own. It reads them, identifies racial covenants based on patterns of language (which is exactly what LLMs are very good at), and then flags them for a human to review.

    This tool is not replacing jobs, because the whole point is that these reviews were never going to get the budget and manpower to be done manually, and instead would have simply remained on the books.

    I get being disdainful or even angry about LLMs in our unregulated-capitalism anti-worker hellhole because of the way that most companies are using them, but tools aren’t themselves good or bad, they’re just tools. And using a tool to identify racial covenants in legal documents that otherwise would go un-remediated, seems like a pretty good use to me.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      So, what? They’re going to pay a human to OK the output and the whole lot of them never even gets seen?

      Say 12 minutes per covenant, that’s 1 million work hours that humans could get paid for. Pay them $50 an hour and it’s $50 million. That’s nothing, less than 36 hours worth of the $12.5 Billion in weapons shipments we’ve sent to Israel in the last year. We could pay for projects like this with the rounding errors on the budget for blowing up foreign kids, and the people we pay to do it could afford to put their kids through college.

      Instead, we get a project to train a robotic bigotry filter for real estate legalese and 50 more cruise missiles from the savings.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I think you are confused about the delineation between local and federal governments. It’s not all one giant pool of tax money. None of Santa Clara County’s budget goes to missiles.

        Also, this feels like you are too capitalism-pilled, and rather than just spending the $240 to do this work, and using the remaining $49,999,760 to just fund free college or UBI programs, you’re like, “how about we pay these people to do the most mind-numbingly, soul-crushingly boring work there is, reading old legal documents?”

        You know what would actually happen if you did that? People would seriously read through them for 1 day, and then they’d be like, “clear”, “clear”, “clear” without looking at half of them. It’s not like you’re gonna find and fund another group to review the first group’s work, after all. So you’d still be where we are now, but you also wasted x* peoples’ time that they could have been enjoying doing literally anything else.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think you are confused about the delineation between local and federal governments.

          I am not, I simply don’t believe the delineation is relevant since taxpayers fund both the state and federal budgets.

          Also, this feels like you are too capitalism-pilled

          This is me being “reasonable” and working within the constraints of the system. If we aren’t going to have free universal college et al then we can at least trade some of the bloated military budget for a public works program.

          People would seriously read through them for 1 day, and then they’d be like, “clear”, “clear”, “clear” without looking at half of them.

          Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.

          It’s not like you’re gonna find and fund another group to review the first group’s work, after all.

          Why not? We could hire three teams to do it simultaneously in every state in the country and the cost would still be a tiny fraction of how much was wasted on the F-35 program.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.

            It certainly would be. Thankfully, there’s many more than zero human eyes involved in this.