Inspired by some of the discussion in this thread. I don’t think it’s appropriate place for that discussion there, but hey why not have a separate thread for it

If I think religion is not good in general, am I Reddit and cringe and basically Richard Dawkins?

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sam Harris is a cult leader, a quack, and a fraud, and yet so many “rational” and “logical” New Atheists still believe he’s an authority on anything when even his doctorate came from a phony foundation financed by his family that was made specifically to give him that doctorate then dissipated. The fucking quack doesn’t even do any peer-reviewed papers!

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Sam Harris also had some exceptionally clownish takes, such as the claim that “there is more scientific progress in a single New York zip code than in all the history of Islam.”

        How does one even measure scientific progress in a zip code compared to the history of an entire religion and all its associated sociopolitical connections across many lands, especially one that came up with Algebra (it’s in the name!) and chemistry (started under Al-chemy!) and arabic numerals which we’re using on this site right now?

        That’s just it: you can’t. It’s not even compatible measurements! Even if they were, it’s fucking wrong.

        • And even if it was true, you have to be some kind of unique techno bro piece of shit to want to quantify the value of a people’s lives through technological discovery. Like, your culture is only worth something if it produces le science, not because it has a right to exist and thrive by virtue of existing. Might as well get rid of all art that’s not bazinga sci-fi marvel slop to make you go awooga

          The whole other thread about China had me thinking about this all day. How fucking slimy do you have to be to say “the Chinese people would be worth so much more if they invented more gadgets”

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            The whole other thread about China had me thinking about this all day. How fucking slimy do you have to be to say “the Chinese people would be worth so much more if they invented more gadgets”

            I missed that thread. What the fuck was the take maker saying exactly?

            • https://hexbear.net/post/3801944?scrollToComments=false

              The person we were dunking on was lamenting the “wasted potential” of le science Chinese people would’ve discovered if only they were a liberal democracy.

              This rubbed me all sorts of wrong of course, but mostly because this person can only understand a people’s value by amount of technology, like if people don’t spend every waking moment being epic scientists they’re a waste of space, and that all knowledge that’s doesn’t fit this person’s view of development is worthless.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Think of the advancements and innovations

                So many lost opportunities to churn out additional plastic trash! China’s actual scientific achievements after the revolution don’t count because reasons! porky-scared

                Free-thinking, questioning, exploring souls

                The only acceptable mindset is to be an insufferably selfish western-style treat brain! porky-scared

                You weren’t kidding. Fuck that asshole.

                • It’s just so… inhuman. When I think about the wasted potential (even if I’m a bit uncomfortable with the phrase) because of capitalism and genocide and dispossession, I don’t think that we’ve been deprived of flying cars or nuclear fusion or whatever; I think about how many people could’ve been happier in a different world, how many families could’ve loved each other for longer and better, how many celebrations and expressions of the human condition could be out there, how much we’re missing out on the feeling of basic human dignity because we’re ground into paste by an uncaring, poisonous system.

                  I get really suspicious, and really sad, when someone demonstrates all they care about is technology, leaving any other part of being human to the side.

                  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    It’s just so… inhuman. When I think about the wasted potential (even if I’m a bit uncomfortable with the phrase) because of capitalism and genocide and dispossession, I don’t think that we’ve been deprived of flying cars or nuclear fusion or whatever; I think about how many people could’ve been happier in a different world, how many families could’ve loved each other for longer and better, how many celebrations and expressions of the human condition could be out there, how much we’re missing out on the feeling of basic human dignity because we’re ground into paste by an uncaring, poisonous system.

                    I know how you feel and I share that feeling; I’ve gotten into some ugly internet arguments with vulgar utilitarians about such things: all that matters is the delusional fantasy of science beakers adding up to attain a Science Victory like in a fucking Civ game; actually living life and sharing that experience with love didn’t mean anything to such misanthropes.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Might as well get rid of all art that’s not bazinga sci-fi marvel slop to make you go awooga

            Early in the LLM treat printer hype wave era, one of the hottest takes I had ever seen was exactly that: that art shouldn’t really exist unless it’s optimized for maximum enjoyment for the maximum number of people, which the treat printers could objectively provide, no further “not real job” artists required.

            You know, utter fucking slop pandering to hogs.

            Utilitarianism can be a fuck.

            https://existentialcomics.com/comic/426

        • vegeta1 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I also notice how a lot of atheist online who are noticeably quiet about the famous atheists who do convert to Christianity like Russell brand or ayan hrsi especially when they cosign far right rhethoric . It definitely would be a hell of a lot louder if one of em converted to islam