• BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Biden would not have won if we weren’t also in the middle of the greatest global pandemic in a century that the incumbent Trump administration was handling terribly.

  • Keith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because Biden was to the left of Harris, and Gaza wasn’t a big issue? Like yeah, the people who didn’t vote did so because of Harris’ move to the right

  • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    What about Joe Biden made him sufficiently left while Kamala Harris wasn’t?

    -Joe Biden wasn’t campaigning to finish building Trump’s wall. Or saying that actually it was a good idea to build the wall and the only problems were just that Trump said Mexico was going to pay for it and that he didn’t finish the job.

    -Joe Biden wasn’t campaigning on being pro-fracking. And bragging about how he was the tie breaking vote for the IRA, which leased new land for fracking. (I understand there was more to this act, but Harris points to it as a way to show she supports fracking)

    -At the time the genocide in Gaza hadn’t ramped up and gotten as much publicity as has now, so we didn’t get to hear Joe Biden’s stance on it.

    -Joe Biden wasn’t calling to ensure America has the “strongest most lethal fighting force in the world”.

    -Joe Biden didn’t align himself with the Cheneys.

    You see that 10 million more Democrats voted for Biden, but stayed home for Harris and you believe the problem is with the people and not the candidate? Now granted, racism and sexism played a role in this for sure. But to attribute that much of a difference just to that? Most of the people that are deeply racist and sexist are already voting for Trump because he supports those ideas. And from what I’ve seen, the Republican voters stayed pretty consistent from last election. It was mainly a dip in Democratic voters. If the problem is with the voters and not just that Harris was an incredibly weak candidate, then why do you believe that many more people voted last election?

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Seriously what did you expect after 4 years of genocide joe?

    More importantly I can’t believe libs are still vote shaming (about “commies” lmao) a week after their garbage candidate got blown out.

    Never going to learn.

  • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    I mean, Harris and the Dems didn’t even try, like seriously. Getting Beyonce and all the other celebrities our fellow moronic Americans already see as members of the illuminati is not trying, it’s literally the opposite

    I mean, they spent $50m+ in fuckin Ohio! We lost fuckin Georgia while they were jerking off Cheney’s and trying to convince white folks in the suburbs not to be who they are

    It’s legit insane to see the party straightup abandon working class demographics. Then again, this is the same party that now literally spends millions of dollars each primary on getting votes for Republican politicians

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I was excited when Biden dropped out and Harris got this huge surge as the new young, not actively deteriorating candidate, then more excited when she announced Tim Walz and got a mid western, blue collar surge, and cautiously optimistic when everyone was briefly focusing on how anti-democratic and un-American Project 2025 was, but then started getting worried when all I saw running up to the election was stories about abortion rights and women voting against their husbands and celebrity endorsements.

      It feels like Obama successfully ran a campaign of Hope and Change, and since then Democrats repeatedly campaign on maintaining the status quo and just not letting it slide too much further. And while it’s possible to win an election on the basis of ‘I’m at least somewhat competent’, it might not be in the US when so much of the population sees how fundamentally broken wealth inequality is at baseline.

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Not discounting anything you wrote here, but it still entertains me when people call the 60 year old Kamala Harris young.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        started getting worried when all I saw running up to the election was stories about abortion rights and women voting against their husbands and celebrity endorsements.

        That surge when she started was all her campaign. The news and dis/info sources were all caught flat-footed.

        They cast around for a few weeks testing what stories would “drive engagement”. Scandals? No. VP pick, like - Who’s it gonna be? No. Did she take any of the demented rapist’s baiting? Nope. Dang.

        At the end, they settled on those, and that’s why it seemed different. They (corporate news, mostly) had finally wrested a narrative out of the campaign the campaign didn’t disagree with.

        It was thin, a little schlocky, but either true or based on the campaigns ads, so - that got stamped on the campaign, and that’s why you remember that specific set of themes.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maintaining the status quo is conservatism.

        By definition that’s not what the left wants.

        • rishado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          How about some actual progressive policy? Not sure how people like you manage to play ignorance for this long.

          You’re being hard headed if you want everyone you argue with in the comments to list exactly what they were looking for. How about you go into chat gpt and ask "what are some progressive policies that Democratic voters want that aren’t being reflected by the DNC and you’ll get exactly what you’re facetiously asking us

          • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Let me be more clear: the votes aren’t there. You would like to believe that you as a progressive who is frustrated with Dems for not being progressive enough is a large enough constituency. I would like that to be the case as well. Unfortunately, almost all progressives voted on Kamala (and on HRC before that), and it’s just not enough.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Are you fucking kidding? Because Biden 2020 was a progressive platform and Harris 2024 was a centrist one. They weren’t even remotely similar. Biden may be a centrist, but he’s very pro-labor, and he could see how important the progressive base was that election, so he literally sat down with Sanders and hammered out a platform that they could get behind. And while I’ve got a lot of problems with Joe Biden, he actually was very committed to that platform. He really wanted BBB to get through and he kept trying to find ways to abolish student debt.

    Harris, on the other hand, had a handful of disparate, vaguely left policy positions, like the first-time homebuyer’s credit and legalizing pot, but her campaign was mainly centered on economic opportunity for the middle class. She also committed wholeheartedly to the most right-wing polices of the Biden administration, like arming Israel and cracking down on the border. But worst of all, she made bipartisanship and Republican consensus a huge part of her campaign, promising to add Republicans to her cabinet , campaigning with Liz Cheney, and even praising Dick Fucking Cheney.

    TL;DR, Biden campaigned like Obama in 2008, Harris Campaigned like Hillary in 2016. And the results were the same.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Do you even remember 2020? Nobody fucking wanted Biden. He was never progressive. He was literally mocked for telling donors “Nothing will fundamentally change.” People turned out because of how much they hated Trump.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        That actually occurred in 2019, not 2020. After Bernie nearly stomped him in the primary, he made a hard pivot to the left in 2020. As I said, he’s a centrist, but he actually does have a strong history of pro-union activism, which made him a fairly credible (though imperfect) messenger for a populous platform.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        I do what I can. If the question had been asked in good faith, I might have even been nice about it.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Don’t forget that Biden was the first president to walk a picket line. No other president had ever done that in America’s history. That single action won over the UAW.

      Then, Biden fought back against the railroad corporations and won a contract for workers that includes PTO and other basic labor necessities.

      Then, Biden reduced fentanyl overdoses, something that no president has done in like 30-40 years.

      Couple this with BBB and IRA, you have a much more progressive president than what people give water to it.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        Well, I don’t want to give him too much credit. Biden is and always has been a centrist. He has a mixed history on Civil Rights (cause he’s 120 years old), he has a pretty pro-bank history, he’s supported some anti-consumer stuff (like the anti-bankruptcy laws), and he even helped put Clarence Thomas on the bench. And that’s not even touching on his administration, where Gaza and the border will probably be his lasting legacy. But, two things that he’s always been pretty consistent on were unions and infrastructure, and he read the room in 2020 and leaned heavily into those things.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Oh I agree. He likely made all of those concessions because 1) he wanted to rally the base following the 2020 primaries, and 2) to stick it to the establishment Dems. Seems like Biden has grown to be quite the grumpy old man to those in the party.

          I agree with you in Gaza and the border. Biden has shown no backbone to Netanyahu, and his administration introduced a border bill that echoed a lot of Trump’s sentiments.

          On the whole, it’s hard to make the call on whether Biden or Harris would have been better to run against Trump, but all that matters now is that we continue the message that establishment Democrats got us here by chasing centrism instead of progress. We need to root out a lot of people who actually do the politicking in the party because if those people aren’t out, we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

          Hasan Piker put it well the other day. If this were a game of sports, underperformers would be benched pretty aggressively. If this were a job, underperformers would be put on a performance plan (hopefully) or fired straight up.

          There are people consulting Democrats that have failed time and again since 2016, hell even 2008. They need OUT.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            all that matters now is that we continue the message that establishment Democrats got us here by chasing centrism instead of progress. We need to root out a lot of people who actually do the politicking in the party because if those people aren’t out, we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

            100% this. On Monday, I’m calling my state and federal representatives and telling them DNC chair Jamie Harrison needs to go. Then I’m gonna start looking for movements that will primary anyone who still thinks incrementalism and centrism are a path forward. From now on, Medicare for All and UBI need to be the bare minimum standard for anyone that wants a D in front of their name.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        remember earlier this year when leftists were saying biden never did anything and that he was too old, and started refusing to vote for him and calling for him to drop out, and he did?

        remember the six months following that when leftists were complaining that the person they got biden to drop out for wasn’t good enough and how they weren’t going to vote for her?

        and now that trump won suddenly leftists are singing biden’s praises and blaming trump’s win on the DNC picking a shit candidate?

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          I honestly have no clue how you constructed your conception of “leftists”.

          Leftists != Tankies != Blue MAGA/Anon != Progressives

          Biden did great things while in office. However, the Left has the liberty to continue pushing the current administration to go farther and implement more policies in line with their ideals. This is a force that counters the Right.

          Biden did not go far enough on Gaza, and neither did Kamala. The same goes for corporations like those in the Oil & Gas sector that raised their prices following oil demobilization during COVID, as well as those that kept their prices high even years after like those producing consumer goods. Could have gone farther.

          When the existing administration makes no concessions to those in the base that voted for that administration but not as their first choice, they have the right to criticize and call out the administration’s failure to represent them.

          All of this would be fixed, or at least alleviated if we abandoned our political duopoly in favor of an electoral and congressional system that allowed for more diversity in government. Ranked choice seems to be taking off in many states.

          Oh, and Kamala was great at the beginning. She took over for Biden, then chose Tim Walz. But then her administration attached itself to Biden, the person that spawned her campaign since the Democratic base utterly rejected him following the debate, and then went after the Right in hope of gaining more votes, taking their own base for granted.

          Now that we have the full scope of Kamala’s campaign, she ran on much more conservative values than Biden did in his campaign leading up to the 2020 election.

          This nuance is not something you’ll see in the mainstream media, perhaps not even on Lemmy. But this is the realm that hopefully progressives like me and some Leftists operate in.

          Your mindset is honestly the same that many ignorant people share regarding science and the scientific method. Things can be true for different reasons and at different times.

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            i’m not debating any of that. i’m just kind of mad at leftists for being mad at the DNC for doing exactly what they told them to do.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    Everyone is still pissed about inflation, and her answer to what she would do better was ‘nothing’.

    Everything else is just noise around the edges.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because people pissed at inflation are fucking stupid. Inflation is down. They aren’t pissed at greedy corporations, which have been the problem the entire fucking time.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        You know you’ve heard people say inflation hasn’t stopped because prices are still high. Like they’re going to magically get better prices when inflation stops.

        Yeah it’s stupid, welcome to America.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 days ago

          Actually they’re not wrong, wages were not increased to keep up with inflation so stopping it alone wasn’t enough.

            • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              I think the problem is that inflation does not impact the poorest population the same:

              The CPI weighting is based on an average consumer, the poorest people will have more sensibility to price change for things like food or rent.

              Rent and food prices increase in total by 20-25% in 4 years. If you were already tight at the beginning of the Biden presidency, you’re now have a high chance of being homeless.

          • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            8 days ago

            The sad thing is that there are a thousand ways to attack prices, or even just give sound bites that the public can run with. But almost all of them would upset neoliberal billionaires, so they can never be spoken.

        • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          They think it’ll be like gas prices. They go up, but the “right guy” will make them come back down, ignoring the fact that that only happens with commodities like oil. Once a company raises prices, they rarely bring them back down. Tha6s called deflation, and it’s not good.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Well, we kind of need deflation to happen because the alternative is rising wages and that’s not fucking happening.

            • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              We need to do what Harris had stated, and go after all these companies price gouging like we are still in the middle of the COVID pandemic. And that is now only going to get worse with a con man in office set on making himself, his companies, and his friends (which is anyone that says nice things to him) as rich as possible by extracting what remains of the working class. They are going to weaken/dismantle unions, and likely start mass death/slave labor camps for the poor.

              He is also going to use his new position of power to pass laws to shield crypto scammers, and use his new crypto platform to undermine the US dollar and try and force more people to his crypto grift run by some of the worse humans around. And use his NFT/crypto stuff to openly except bribes to sell off the US to the highest bidder so when his dementia gets bad enough they put JD in charge he can live out the rest of his days being fed liquid cheese burgers on a golden spoon.

                • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Not sure JD would get any additional terms, the cult might want to install either Jr. or Eric and start a “royalty” line of succession. And hope that Ivanka enjoys the hellscape she helped usher in for her daughter, and women everywhere.

            • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Deflation just means everyone is already starving. Deflation isn’t the start of a process, it’s the result of massive failure. Just like inflation doesn’t happen the second money is printed, it has to circulate before price inflation is a thing.

              What we need are labor groups, and taxes on companies who use government benefits as part of their wage calculation.

              In short, never try to make prices go down, instead make wages go up, and make competition control prices.

              • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Deflation isn’t the start of a process, it’s the result of massive failure

                We’ve already had a massive failure. The economy doing great and yet everyone’s broke? Such a blatant lie! Time to acknowledge and lower prices to end food waste.

                • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Everyone is broke, but still buying everything in the economy? Sorry, time to acknowledge the reality that life is just hard. Deflation happens after it gets really bad.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 days ago

        We live in a nation of people that are a mix of uneducated and propagandized. If the party messaging doesn’t take that into account, that fault lies with them in addition to the voters.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s not enough that the rate of inflation is slowing. The problem is that wages aren’t going up to match inflation. When people are working two jobs and still living paycheck to paycheck, do you think it means anything to them to tell them that “um ackshually, inflation is down 0.4% from last year!”?

        This kind of disconnect is exactly why we aren’t reaching voters.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          California voted to not raise minimum wage, too.

          Also they kept prison slave labor.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            Come on now don’t bring up that in one of the “left most” and most populous state in the union that people are actually pretty non leftist, it might contradict some of their feel based arguments.

            America is not full of progressives. I don’t know why people here can never be convinced otherwise.

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 days ago

              America is a country that lies to itself. It claims we need to make female super heroes flat chested to combat sexism, but then turn around and laugh at the idea of a female president so hard they’re willing to give Hitler a second chance.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              America is not full of progressives.

              No it is not and I’ll toss another example on there -

              Gay marriage was only legalized nation wide by a bunch of unelected judges, and the second most-recent Democratic president “evolved” on the issue less than a decade ago.

              US postures as the world’s defender of LGBT rights when it’s “bringing democracy” places, but it’s not great at doing that internally.

        • ultranaut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Wages have outpaced inflation recently. Things have generally been heading in the right direction since the pandemic but it came too late and the masses are mostly ignorant or misinformed so the data is irrelevant to them. Its about how people feel as you point out, there’s not a rational argument against feelings, people feel how they feel. One side has become very good at taping into those feelings, the other side is talking about data and no one gives a shit unless the data validates what they feel.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        People who rent got hit twice as hard by inflation, I know I’m paying a significantly higher portion of my paycheck in rent vs 4 years ago.

        The raw material cost increases which provide the cover/excuse for price gouging are the result of two different things the Harris/Biden admin participated in and had no real path towards solving.

        One is the fact that the vast majority of ocean shipping is going around Africa rather than the red sea, due to the ongoing genocide in Gaza that the Biden admin has been bypassing Congress to continue arming.

        Two is the cutting off of Russian oil, which resulted in ballooning costs in Europe.

        Like it or not, Harris did not provide any answers on these two fronts that looked anything like a change in policy.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because fixing inflation means jacking up interest rates and cutting government spending. And no-one wants that.

      People are too stupid to understand inflation and too stupid to understand how it’s combated.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      I actually don’t think so. Like I speak with Republicans that are very dismissive of covid still, despite having family members die to it. If people were bothered by his covid response, they would continue to be bothered by the fact Trump shit the covid response. Instead it seems voters think everything was fine during his term (completely uninformed or unaware of the fact that he was impeached twice, raped women, a good friend and neighbor of Epstein, and tried to overthrow the government)

      The apathy maybe comes from how Harris was hand picked (because it was so last minute that Biden dropped off) vs us having an actual primary with several democrats.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Republicans aren’t the ones who didn’t turn out, idk what this has to do with what they think about Trumps covid response. If you want to know why 10 million more democratic voters turned out last time covids gonna play a large factor.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Bernie.

    Bernie was what got us to vote for Biden. Biden formed a comittee with Bernie and actually adopted a bunch of his ideas. That’s what got the left to vote for Biden.

    That and all of us were reeling from the economy after coronavirus.

    Meanwhile Harris told the left to fuck off with your Palestinians are human nonsense and tried to get the Liz Cheney constituency (that doesn’t exist).

  • Comrade Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Because we did vote for Biden and he was useless at preventing the spread of fascism in states, and then Harris’s responses to how she would handle any of it, which was effectively “I will do nothing.” The Democrats made the left apathetic to the electoral system by refusing to appeal to them and instead the democrats focused on trying to sway republicans and moved further right. The Democrats did the worst thing they could have done and made people apathetic and hopeless.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Useless at preventing fascism… So decided to sit it out and give DT another go. Bold strategy. Let’s see how it works out.

      • Comrade Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can keep bitching about how its everyone else’s fault why we are in the situation we are in. You aren’t the people I see at the antifascist rallies, or out on the street trying to organize grassroots systems to protect our queer community, or doing anything. Yall are the type of people who start and stop at the voting booth. Too busy shilling politicians who refuse to do what the people want to do anything that actually helps people. Don’t accuse people who voted third party or didn’t vote for the situation we are in, cause you don’t know that they do nothing. They very well could be doing more than you to make a difference.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        The elections over dipshit, and putins dog won. Why would they still pay their troll farms when the deal has been sealed?

        Ever think people looked online and saw behavior such as yours and felt they didn’t want to be involved with people like you?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It ain’t “the commies”.

    And he won by an incredibly tiny margin in a handful of states to win, literally no one was “set on fire” for Biden

    Progressive policy is popular with the politically disengaged as well as others who are politically engaged

    When the ones who are engaged try to warn people someone is a bad candidate and isn’t left enough to motivate the politically disengaged, we magically go back to Salem and you all start blaming us for being able to see the logical conclusion of your dumbass plans.

    Run another candidate in 2028 that’s significantly to the right of the Dem voter base and the same shit will happen again.

    That’s not a threat, it’s basic logic.

    It might not be the candidate you want, but isn’t stopping republican more important than you getting exactly what you want?

    Obama ran a progressive campaign and was charismatic…

    Why not try that again since moderates over retirement age keeps failing?

    Kamala might be like three years younger than Obama now, but he entered the White house 16 years ago

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago
    • Obviously, the main reason for record turnout in 2020 was COVID.

    • Biden actually has decent political instincts and has actually won elections before. Kamala didn’t even have to pass a primary and bombed out of the one she did participate in in 2020. She was “untested” to put it mildly.

    • The economic situation was different.

    • Regardless of to what degree he was responsible, under Biden the US got entangled in foreign conflicts in Palestine and Ukraine.

    • It’s not that there are 10 million commies that liked Biden but not Harris, it’s that us commies believe that you can win over the working class by appealing to material interests.

    • Biden didn’t campaign with fucking Dick Cheney

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Biden actually has decent political instincts and has actually won elections before. Kamala didn’t even have to pass a primary and bombed out of the one she did participate in in 2020. She was “untested” to put it mildly

      I believe democrats called bernie Sanders “unelectable” so I feel it’s fair to use that term in this circumstance.

    • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 days ago
      • Trump was a bigot, which is what a majority of Americans wanted.

      Weird how so many of you demonize the largest most powerful organization of antifascists in America instead of those who voted to give Trump power. It’s almost like you are trying to sow division in the anti-trump electorate 🤔

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        largest most powerful organization of antifascists in America

        Please do not insinuate that the Democratic Party is Anti-Fascist. They have have adopted Trump’s 2016 border policy, are unconditionally funding a genocide, and will peacefully transfer power to those they acknowledge are fascists. They are not antifascists, they are merely the lesser fascists.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          “The Democrats are fascists” is exactly the narrative MAGA espouses. When someone ostensibly anti-MAGA attacks the largest coalition of anti-MAGA forces, that person is pro-MAGA.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            So in your mind no one can criticize the DNC’s failure to stop fascism or its concessions to said fascist movemet? Our glorious leadership must be blindly followed no matter how many times they fail or give ground to fascists?

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        This sort of thinking is why Democrats keep repeating the same mistakes. Any sort of criticism, even if it’s constructive, is treasonous. It’s always someone else’s fault.

        Organizations either adapt or die. Rejection of criticism is a suicidal, accelerationist position. When people are so concerned with deflecting blame that they’re incapable of performing an honest, frank assessment of which strategies work and which don’t, then you are destined to fail no matter whether its a political party or anything else. If you’d prefer the Democrats keep doing things that don’t work because you’re afraid of them losing face, then your perspective is worthless.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Twisting of words and arguing against a point someone didn’t make is a common alt-right “debate” strategy. Readers please note that I did not say that members of the Democratic party are above criticism. The person I am replying to continues to blame antifascists for the rise of fascism.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            The car just slammed into a wall and it’s backing up and preparing to slam in into the same wall for the third time, and I’m yelling at the driver to turn left so it doesn’t hit the wall again, and your response is like, “Why are you criticizing the driver? You must be trying to distract them so the car crashes!”

            Since you’re totally not saying that the democrats are above criticism, since that’s only me “twisting your words,” why don’t you tell me what the democrats did wrong that they could’ve done differently or could do differently in the future to avoid an outcome like this?

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Biden was running on massive infrastructure investment, student loan forgiveness, ending the war in Afghanistan, child tax credit and a $2000 cheque in the mail . Harris may have had those in her platform as well but she wasn’t mentioning it or Bidens wins on these at all, her campaign was “I’m not trump” and we learned from Hillary that’s not enough.

    Biden campaign was “build back better” a motto for change much like another democrat who actually won. Harris’ campaign was “were not going back” which implies no change and relies on you thinking the trump years were horrible enough to justify the current status quo, and apparently the only thing Americans remember about the trump years was the economy was “better” and wanted to go back.