• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jesus. That’s a long dumb article over absolutely nothing. They’re still Jaguar.

  • Superfool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s going to be quite a rebrand to get people to overlook the brand problems.

    The current generation is plagued with reliability issues and they have a resale value that plummets harder than Putin’s critics.

    The generation before that looked like rebadged Fords, but at least they were slightly more reliable.

    Time will tell I guess.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember having a discussion with someone while driving and I raised the issue of Jaguar reliability.

    “Wow! I never heard that before!”

    (Radio announcer) “Traffic advisory on I-205… apparently a Jaguar has caught fire.”

    Gestures wildly at the radio…

  • Default_Defect
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Stared at the title trying to understand the “jaguar eating faces” reference before I remembered that its a car brand. I need to lay off reading political commentary for a bit.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait a second… jaguars are encroaching on the leopards face eating territory? Good thing the USA just offered up a lot more faces or we might run into some sort of face eaters territorial disputes.