• Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    At this rate America’s 4B movement is gonna stand for “bang bang bang bang”…

  • Yewb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Im a liberal guess who now has a gun safe with multiple guns?

    I guess we are making America great again by arming the liberals too?

  • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why are Americans answers to everything guns? So much paranoia and mental health issues in this country it’s insane.

    • SleepyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      If you look at the one side of the political spectrum that seems to be usurping power over here, they fucking LOVE guns. It wouldnt surprise me that if they got violent, it would be armed heavily with firearms. This is the exact response i would expect from would be victims of aforementioned gun violence. in the words of my constituion and bible humping american brethren, we shall NOT BE VICTIM TO A TYRANNICAL STATE!

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well, we can’t effectively ban guns. At least not in our foreseeable political future. And the people who are already armed are overwhelmingly voting to elect a fascist who likes to incite violence among minority groups… It’s kinda easy to see why people would want to arm themselves.

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I mean rapists, transphobes, bigots, and neo Nazis all now feel carte blanche freedom to do whatever they please in this country. There will absolutely be more crimes against women, LGBTQ+, minorities, and liberals. Not arming yourself against these animals is the insane thing.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What would you suggest? I have three trans friends who are making plans to move, at least for a few years, but not everyone can do that.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s me, another trans who is actively applying to move out of the US. If I were staying here I’d be arming myself too even though I hate everything about guns. I’ve been voting, protesting, community aid, talking with people I know, building relations with my neighbors, it’s all backsliding anyway. Not a lot of options left for me

    • invalid_name@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People radicalized to insane culture war bullshit and irrational solipsistic oblivion cults can’t really be negotiated with.

      Institutions will never fix anything.

      Intense atomization and alienation keep us from creating society with one another. There’s no time to do anything complicated; most of us work too much. You just get home and youre exhausted.

      So; gun.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        People radicalized to insane culture war bullshit and irrational solipsistic oblivion cults can’t really be negotiated with.

        You realize that it sounds like you’re talking referring to trans people and allies in this comment right? Just to be clear, which group are you referring to?

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The left needs to get on board with this. Govt isn’t going to protect you from far right militias when the shit hits the fan.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ive had one for a while. It’s not something I hope to ever use, but now it’s less likely that an armed person will be coming after me for my money, which I can just give and not have to kill to defend myself, and more likely they’re coming for my life.

  • Ekybio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    With sentiment like “your body, my choice” floating around more and more, I hope that everyone in need will arm themselves accoringly.

    Because the guys on the other guys think they are made of steel. Remind them that they have a lot of very vulnerable blood vessels close to the skin and that knifes are as cheap as their lies…

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I do not blame any woman or queer person arming themselves in the U.S. right now. But I think that you should think of it as personal protection rather than preparation for something larger.

    Be aware of this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disarmament_of_the_German_Jews

    The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country’s population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson’s suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.

    Obviously, women and queer people are a lot more than 1% of the population, but you can’t count on every queer person being on the right side and you certainly can’t count on every woman to be on the right side.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        54 minutes ago

        that was before tanks and instant communication. the army would have been less organized and maybe you could have a chance against the government, especially as a militia. today you don’t.

        you do have a chance against a bunch of fuckwads who threaten you because the party they voted for won and the think they can rape freely now. just not the government.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It was also opposed by George Washington on the argument that “A bunch of farmers with guns will never defeat a trained army.” He basically did exactly that, but it took the support of one of the world’s largest super powers at the time in order to do it - France.

        Not to say don’t arm yourself. I plan on doing exactly that myself. But don’t expect to be overthrowing the dictatorship to come. There are no resistance groups being armed by the EU here.

        • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Washington was talking about the militias that were present in the early parts of the war that were under trained and undisciplined. The red coats took them easily and they fled often so the continental congress started the continental army lead by Washington, which was a trained and disciplined army in the style of European standing armies, which was able to take on and even defeat the British occasionally.

          After the war the ruling elite still had this idealized vision of citizen militias protecting the liberty of white man and saw it as a less tyrannical, and cheaper model then the European professional standing army and made the second amendment to encourage it. Washington was saying that that system failed and will never work and that we should have a trained army ready to take on European powers if they come back.

          Now we have the worst of both worlds, a massive army that gobbles up tax dollars and a bunch of untrained citizens with guns who barely understand what a militia is much less can protect the liberty of the nation.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, pretty much what I was getting at. We live in a country where everybody believes themselves to be the hero in their own Rambo style action movie.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              27 seconds ago

              “Just another American who saw too many movies as a child? Another orphan of a bankrupt culture who thinks he’s John Wayne? Rambo? Marshal Dillon?”

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What a bunch of slave-owners thought about guns hundreds of years ago is not really relevant to today.

        And if you’re going to attack someone for thinking people should be armed for the wrong reason, maybe you should find better targets.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Whoa, I’m not attacking you. I have a difference in opinion as to why people should be armed. Not saying that one does not have a right to self defense, just that i put stock in the need to collectively hold the government accountable and fight tyranny

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            And you can see why, from what I already wrote, that is not likely to work unless the majority is on your side. And the military.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The military has had a pretty lousy track record against gorilla warfare from much smaller, worse armed groups who, by the width of an ocean were unable to affect logistical lines, the means to project warfare, or the families of our soldiers. A Revolution within would be much worse.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                How many innocent people died in those wars? It’s not very nice of you to be willing to put their lives on the line like that.

                • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Oh? Now it’s a discussion about who should be sacrificed and for what. Freedom always has a cost. I never removed myself from the possibility. But right now, the royal “we”, seem to be sacrificing the minority, the different, the poor, the non christian and it gets worse every day. Freedoms are slipping, corporations get stronger, and standards of living and hope for the future fades. This will only accelerate. Arguing to arm oneself for personal protection but not collective action will doom all, but the chosen, to be picked off one by one.

      • zabadoh@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That is historically true, unfortunately the conservative artificial supermajority Supreme Court doesn’t respect its own precedents and historical facts.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I mean the Supreme Court can say what they like. But their power is derived by the people. It can be taken back.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Can confirm, my wife has expressed an interest. We’re just waiting for the local LGBTQ friendly range to open.

    The other local ranges are either run by cops (ACAB) or require NRA memberships to join. Yeah, that’s not happening.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sometimes you have to open the gun range you wish to see in your neighborhood.

      Or something like that. I think Gandhi said it.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        The one we’re waiting on is called Wooster Armory in Tigard/Beaverton. Kinda by Washington Square, by the Guitar Center. The gunshop is open, but it looks like they’re having trouble getting the range open. I’m going to pop in and say “Hi!” today and see what the deal is.

        Threat Dynamics in Sherwood is good too, I did my AR training there.

        Edit Wooster is now saying January for members, February for the public.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Stay strapped or get clapped…

    It feels like they picked the worst screenshot intentionally though when talking about that YouTuber…

    Like, maybe it’s a new kind of magnifier that you flip up to use instead of off to the side to not use. But that AR just doesn’t look like whoever built it knew what they were doing.

    Like the BLM protests where it was obvious people went out and bought ARs just for the event and didn’t even put sights on beforehand.

    That being said don’t wander around gun YouTube on your account it only takes a couple videos for the algorithm to decide you’re a gun nut, and that comes along with a bunch of other rightwing videos, because normally it does.

    But Reagan is the one who passed Cali’s gun laws, and he did so because people he didn’t like were marching with guns.

    Obviously it would have made more sense to start when Biden was in office, but it seems like unless protestors carry guns, the cops will just beat them without a second thought.

    If they even think some have guns tho… Cops won’t do shit.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If cops get return fire in a (leftist) protest/riot, they’ll come back with MRAPs and live rounds and re-enact Kent State. They live for that moment.

      Oh, and that magnifier is on a Unity FAST mount, and yes, it flips up to get in position. It’s on a higher sight plane along with the Eotech to help with shooting while using things like night vision goggles, and a lot of people say it’s more natural and comfortable for fast shooting in general. It’s actually some Gucci shit and looks squared away to me.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Weird, I never saw one of those before, but if it works it’s way better than hanging off to the side.

        And I think you’re forgetting how much cops are cowards. They won’t go into a school when it’s one kid with an AR and they have a seat team.

        They’ll say they want a firefight all fucking day, when they get the opportunity they shit their pants.

        But we know how they treat unarmed protestors, and the difference when there’s guns present.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Good. Gun rights are human rights. All people have the right to defend themselves and those around them. Taking that away by banning the only tool that evens the playing field is not OK.