• ClockNimble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As someone who lives in the “wouldn’t be that tough.” That’s big talk for someone who likely doesn’t want to spend their last moments desperately clawing at the roof of a pine box.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean… The Hawaii part went pretty well for them. It was the rest of it afterwards where things went south.

  • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Minnesota is also missing the “wears shorts in winter” tag.

    Happens all the time in negative degree weather.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Pacific Northwest would be horrible to invade. Even if the people don’t offer much resistance trying to get through the Rocky Mountains would be disastrous. But they actually have militias out there too.

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m far more afraid of the Nazis in Baton Rouge running this state than I am of Acadians hunting out in the swamps. Just don’t go in the swamp! The Nazis are actively making life worse whether you seek them or not.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    As a resident of “this part wouldn’t be that tough”, i disagree. The entire Cascade range extending from the top of the central valley to the top of Washington, extending out to the ocean, is very very rough, steep, heavily forested terrain that would be absolute hell to get any kind of equipment through if the locals were to blow up a grand total of three bridges on three separate highways.

    • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also I always like to point out that Oregon has more guns per person than Texas, most people assume Oregon = Portland.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Also, fat chance invading the USA from the Pacific. That’s like trying to get through a chastity belt by putting your dick in the padlock.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Replied to the wrong comment. Leaving it because.

        Americans are the premier naval power.

        Hawaii, Midway and other Pacific islands having monitoring stations.

        The Pacific isn’t as easy to cross as you think due to it’s size and it has some nasty ass storms.

        Pair that with the coastal regions usually having cliffs rather than somewhere a landing craft could pull up and it isn’t easy for a start.

        Now mix in people who know the terrain and don’t want you there.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The USA is particularly strong from that side. Most of its navy patrols those waters, many islands on the Pacific are USA territories all the way to Japan which itself acts as an arm of the USA Military since the forced demilitarization of Japan in WWII. Japan and other islands basically form a wall around the eastern mainland that would be difficult to cross undetected, and when they did reach the shore they might get flanked from Hawaii, Panama, or Alaska.

          There is a reason Stalin chose to ally with and provide nuclear weapons to Cuba, and approach the USA via the gulf of mexico and Atlantic.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Americans are the premier naval power.

          Hawaii, Midway and other Pacific islands having monitoring stations.

          The Pacific isn’t as easy to cross as you think due to it’s size and it has some nasty ass storms.

          Pair that with the coastal regions usually having cliffs rather than somewhere a landing craft could pull up and it isn’t easy for a start.

          Now mix in people who know the terrain and don’t want you there.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      you do conquer it but the locals keep trying to feed you organic, wild harvested, artisanal Amanita soup

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Terrain is the first enemy your army will encounter” - Sun Tzu (not really, I just made that up)

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Nope, logistics is the first enemy. You can have the men and high tech weapons you want. But if you can’t get them to where those things are needed in the quantity they are needed-- You lose.

        The US military is still the best in the world at moving men and material in the least amount of time than anyone else. And as much as fuckcars hates the over grown US highway system, it would be a tremendous advantage to be used against any would be invader.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depending on how far back you want to go, you could make the argument for your army’s first enemy being…

          • Basic training

          • Recruitment

          • Their mothers’ birth canals

          • The dating scene in their home villages

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also: the emerald triangle and that whole area of NorCal are the far-right wackos who regularly fly the state of Jackson flags, they’re heavily armed and waiting to shoot people up there