• PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Brian Thompson killed a whole bunch of people. That’s, to me, the more salient comparison to make.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Penny was attempting to subdue a whackadoo threatening everyone and menacing the train, and the death wasn’t intentional, let alone premeditated; but you ignore what you need to be okay with your para-social attachments.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      200
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      Choking someone to death for a full minute after they’ve gone limp isn’t as clear cut a situation as you’re making it sound and not an appropriate response to a mental health crisis.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        You familiar with how long it takes for the adrenaline of fight or flight to wear off. He probably had no concept of a minute… and since his body was still ampped up probably didn’t even realize the guy was limp. But focus on him anyway. That is what the people in power want. They don’t want you to look deeper and see how they failed the man who had the mental health issue. He shouldn’t have been there. He should have been receiving the care he needed in a safe environment. But shareholders have to see profits.

      • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        51
        ·
        16 days ago

        When that mental health crisis threatens the lives of others and the cops are too lazy to do their jobs of course there will be a reaction like this.

        Its shouldnt be controversial to defend your neighbors.

        • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          Defend your neighbors? Neely wasn’t threatening to kill anyone. Our system has failed us.

    • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Agreed! Killing a Whackadoo who Threatens people is MUCH MORE Forgiving then Killing a Whackadoo who KILLS Millions of Americans including Children!

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          16 days ago

          And he didn’t kill them himself. He’s more of a Charles Manson figure or a mob boss.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          16 days ago

          Not just for profit, that would be ugly greed.

          You got to do it for the shareholders profit, then you’re the capitalist hero.

        • doctorskull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          16 days ago

          that makes it ok in the USA.

          It sucks living in the only capitalist economy anywhere on the globe which america definitely is because no other country in history has ever empowered oligarchs except us 😩

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yeah, these are wildly different situations, and trying to draw comparisons between the two is disingenuous, at best. I’m not happy with the Penny situation, either, and there is plenty to criticize about that case, but the similarities to Mangione’s case end at “one man killed another man in a public space”.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I agree, it’s jumping to conclusions. One case has just been adjudicated, the other has barely even begun. That’s like comparing someone’s brownies from before they went in the oven to someone else’s from after they came out.

      “Nah bro, this sh*t’s gooey AF. Doesn’t even seem edible. 0/10”

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    16 days ago

    Just want to point out the irony that the same people saying that Jordan Neely was not a threat are quite often in the same camp of people saying that it’s fair game to shoot men that say, “you body, my choice” because that’s a credible threat of sexual violence.