We all know the music industry isn’t in a good place right now. Sales are down and artist are not happy. So it made me think? Why don’t the Big 3 (Universal, Warner & Sony) just come together and make their own streaming service with all their music, instead of sharing profits with Spotify and Apple Music? I don’t get it.

Film/TV industries have their own dedicated services like Netflix, HBO Max, Disney+, etc. They don’t have a middle man taking a cut like Cable. Obviously, the Big 3 would need to come together to make this happen. Having 1 music service strictly for just 1 of them is a bad idea.

I just think Spotify & Apple are benefitting from this way more than the labels. And with Spotify paying HUGE amounts to the likes of Joe Rogan 😒. It’s kind of a slap in the face of the industry that MADE them this big. Like why is the Talk Tuah podcast getting just as big of bags as the labels & Artist? I know Jay Z tried his own service ran strictly by the artist called Tidal like 10 years ago, but he couldn’t get enough big artist to invest into it long term.

Can someone PLEASE explain to me why the Music Industry allows this?

  • small44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Actually it the labels who are taking advantages of the streaming services without mentioning profiting from artists they manage. When negotiating deals with streaming services like Spotify or Apple Music, labels often demand large advances. These funds are typically non-recoupable, labels keep this money regardless of how well the music performs on the platform.

    All major labels performed very well this year financially. It is really artists themselves who suffers

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Ohhh. You know, that makes sense. It felt like a stupid question asking how LABELS would allow themselves to screwed over, but once again, they aren’t the ones getting screwed over.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Fun fact: if you’re an artist on Spotify receiving less than 1000 streams in a year, they won’t even bother paying you. You also need a minimum number of unique listeners. That number is secret.

        Spotify is good for those already rich, and bad for those who isn’t.

        They also have Joe Rogan and Gwyneth Paltrow on their payroll, and they actively lobby for more relaxed AI legislatiolegislation in the EU.

        If you have a subscription, the best thing you van do is to cancel it, get your music from the high seas, and instead donate $12 per month or however much it costs directly to artists you enjoy by buying their music or merch online.

        AntennaPod is good for podcasts.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Bandcamp is a good option for directly supporting artists for the time being, especially if you queue up all your purchases for a Bandcamp Friday, where artists/labels receive all the money rather than BC taking their 20% cut.

          • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Bandcamp is a good option for directly supporting artists for the time being, especially if you queue up all your purchases for a Bandcamp Friday, where artists/labels receive all the money rather than BC taking their 20% cut.

            Not just a good option, but the best option I know of. If you buy an album for $5, that’s equivalent to the earnings for thousands of plays on Spotify. And that would be assuming the artist even gets enough total Spotify plays to qualify for their payout under the new rules.

            They are stealing from artists who bring business to the platform, and using the guise of protecting themselves from bot streamers. Oh, and they recently raised the subscription price by 25% in my country. Spotify was the most satisfying subscription to cancel that I have ever cancelled.

            They’re also being accused of pushing their own AI-generated slop music so that they have to pay out even less to real artists. Fuck Spotify.

            • Executive Chimp@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              59 minutes ago

              For anyone reading this who’s put off by the prices, I ditched Spotify and started exclusively buying music on Bandcamp. Apart from an initial splurge, I’ve ended up paying less for music each month. And I own that music permanently. And they got paid more. YMMV of course especially if you’re somebody who doesn’t relisten much, but seeing an album on Bandcamp that costs as much as a month’s Spotify subscription shouldn’t put you off.

            • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Spotify is pushing AI generated music now!? Do they have no damn shame? These platforms and labels are NOTHING without the artist.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      While that is true, even independent artists who don’t have a label grabbing all the profits still get shafted, earning next to nothing with streams.