• JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    6 days ago

    Their fault. I remember a time when publishers allowed for people to run their own dedicated servers, for FPS at least. They could have modified that existing model, but instead they took that ability away from the user whilst almost simultaneously making excuses about the problem they created.

    If their servers can’t run forever, give us dedicated servers on a larger scale FFS!

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I really believe it has nothing at all to do with running the servers or their maintenance costs.

      It’s about control. It’s a rare sight to see any kind of multiplayer experience that isn’t all about selling shit through MTX. If you could run your own server, you might be able to also give yourself the shit they want to nickel and dime you for without paying, and that would really ruin their model.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, but the point is if they’ve already shut off their servers and moved on to the next thing, who cares? Just let the dedicated fans and other nuts run their own servers and they can wash their hands of it entirely. They weren’t going to make any money on it after pulling the plug anyway.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Yep, their argument against game preservation is that some people may use the preserved games for *shock* recreation!

            That is an idiotic argument.

          • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 days ago

            You’ve nailed it with these two points.

            I’d like to add they specifically want to determine when and where you access their IP.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yep.

            If its possible for someone to choose an older, less expensive game, then that means those games are market competitors for similar modern games, with more mechanics designed to coax money out of you.

            Its basically a hyper charged version of planned obsolesence.

        • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          If they completely replace a game with its successor and shut the former down, then people can only play the latter: the developers don’t have to compete with themselves, and the publishers have an easier time with their enshittification of their franchise.

          The game that kicked off SKG in the first place is an example of this, as far as I’ve heard The Crew was better received than The Crew 2 and 3.

          • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I mean you can see it even a bit with Payday 3 and 2, if 2 wasn’t such a cash cow you can believe a lesser company would’ve shut that thing down ages ago

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            The game that kicked off SKG in the first place is an example of this, as far as I’ve heard The Crew was better received than The Crew 2 and 3.

            It actually was just convenient moment. SKG was started long time ago.