• A7thStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m an Xer and I didn’t like Seinfeld, but that’s mostly because I don’t like embarrassment comedy. It’s the same reason I don’t like Will Ferrel and Ben Stiller, but to each their own. I don’t begrudge anyone else finding it funny, it’s just not my vibe.

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I feel like a lot of you assume I’m younger. I’m closer to 50 then I like to admit. I’m just not from the US, maybe that is part of why it didn’t click with me.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And I’m older than you and in the US-- I agree with you that Seinfeld was a waste of scotch tape also. There was nothing about it that ever resonated with me. And for the life of me, I can’t see how anyone else could be so fascinated by the premise of that TV show.

      It’s not even worth the effort to be “offended” by it.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Almost every time an article like this is posted, the contents are the result of one or two comments out of thousands, or a Reddit post that didn’t gain much traction outside of “eh, sure, I guess?”

    Tangentially related, IMO there should be an “author review” site, where if someone posts a stupid article like this, it is referenced in a database against their name and their frame of reference for the content is called out. Rank “journalists” against this, and eventually the people starting out in the industry posting AI-generated shite that doesn’t hold up will start to err on the side of caution.

    • adam_y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’ve just re-invented journalistic standards and peer review.

      It is how the news cycle is supposed to work. One journalist says something, others verify or disprove it publicly.

      The problem is that there is now no difference between journalism and content or between news channels and platforms.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Are we talking about “Seinfeld”, the slightly overrated comedy TV series, or “Seinfeld”, the horrible human being?

  • cobysev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Millennial here. I tried to watch Seinfeld back in the day, and I thought it was kind of meh. But there was one character I really hated on the show. He had a whiny pathetic voice, was always complaining about something or another, and was just an awful actor, unlike the rest of the cast. I thought, if they just removed that one guy, the show would be great and I’d enjoy it so much more.

    I found out later, that guy was Seinfeld. So… I never really got into the show.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        He was supposed to be the outside observer making the jokes about his crazy friends. That’s why early episodes had him literally doing stand up in the intro and outro.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      THANK YOU! I can’t stand that guy. His voice kills me and I never found him funny. Nothing against him personally, he might be a great person, but I can’t understand how people can stand the content he makes.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Good news! Seinfeld is a pedophile and supposedly kind of a sociopath. He’s also tried to hop on the anti-woke train a couple of times in the past few years.

        The man made a major contribution to western cultus as a whole, but man is he a bastard.

        • breakfastburrito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ve seen a few episodes of his show where he takes comedians to get a coffee in his fancy cars. He often comes across like an asshole. Sometimes I wonder if he’s in charge of the show why he would want to be portrayed that way? Presumably he could edit some stuff out?

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Damn, wonder how they’re going to feel about Home Improvement and Married With Children.

    Nevermind All In The Family or The Jeffersons.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      I think sitcoms have improved. There’s a handful of genuinely funny old shows, but the laugh tracks concealed pure garbage.

  • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    most of my millennial peers were all in on Friends and thought Seinfeld was pretty much only for old people. it had its cultural moment but it was popular because pretty much everyone older than 30 in the 90s loved the show.

    Basically people who are around 50/60 now were the ones who truly enjoyed Seinfeld.

  • stinerman [Ohio]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s weird that “this group of people don’t like that show that you like” is supposed to create some sort of negative reaction. My enjoyment of a thing does not depend on a certain number of other people liking it.

    I must be numb to “outrage is the best way to engage people” that everyone uses these days.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      To be fair, Outrage Marketing does work, but it usually isn’t this obvious.

      Like when Disney announced that the Snow White remake would have Seven Multicolored Normal Sized Human People? And later it turned out the final movie will indeed have dwarves?

      That was just done to get bigots talking about the flick. Wouldn’t be surprised to learn Aerial being black in the newer Mermaid movie was the same thing. I mean it worked, people were too busy defending Disney from criticism for this move that they didn’t notice the movie is, like most Live Action Remakes of Non-Live Action media, shit.

      Hey Disney, bring back your 2D Animation, have them do another Lion King, then dub it over with the audio for the Mufasa film. I guarantee I’ll actually consider watching the damn thing if you do that. (These Live Action remakes have got to be a Money Laundering scheme or something)

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hey Disney, bring back your 2D Animation

        Disney used to churn out plenty of entertaining live action shows without issue.

        The problem isn’t with the medium, it’s with the company. They’ve fired too many writers, put too much stock in CGI, and devolved too much of the editing process to the marketing department.

        But the idea that the folks who brought you Tron, The Mighty Ducks, and Pirates of the Caribbean can’t make good live action cinema is crazy.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Before The Little Mermaid Disney made live-action remakes of Pinnochio and Peter Pan. Neither of them had a substantial outrage associated with them and I didn’t hear about either of them until they’d already released and flopped.

    • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Curb Your Enthusiasm convinced me Seinfeld was like 95% Jerry riding Larry David’s coattails. Jerry is so rarely funny to supposedly be “the guy.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Ya know how growing up, our parents called every system a “Nintendo”, even if it was clearly a Playstation or a Sega Genesis?

      Yeah that’s what boomers do with age groups. Anyone younger than them is a “Millenial Zoomer on Youtube’s TikTok app”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ya know how growing up, our parents called every system a “Nintendo”, even if it was clearly a Playstation or a Sega Genesis?

        My parents called everything an Atari

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They said “not that there’s anything wrong with that” about gay people in the 90s. WAY better than most of the shit at the time.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You do realize that’s just a cover phrase people say when they think there is something wrong with that, but don’t want the people they are talking to thinking that they think there is something wrong with that, right?

  • Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Didn’t millennials watch it growing up? Someone’s not getting their generational terms right

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Same goes for younger generations. Everyone old is a boomer.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Hell, I was even old enough when it was airing to think it was overrated then.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          See, that’s the real issue. I don’t have a problem with acknowledging it’s high concept, ocassionally funny and mostly easy watching.

          But everybody insisting it’s endless comedic, best-sitcom-ever brilliance is overrating it. It’s overrated.

            • DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Exactly. Seinfeld isn’t funny now because all the shows after it copied it. When Seinfeld came out, it was revolutionary. No one was doing that humor. They invented it. Now, everyone and their mother has copied them, so it’s played out. And since all these newer sitcoms had time and previous examples to improve on, they do it better, so Seinfeld looks lame by comparison. However, when I as a millennial was watching Seinfeld when it was being originally aired, I thought it was great.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Oh, hell, no. It’s not like Seinfeld invented sitcoms, or even modern sitcoms. It’s not the Model T, it’s the Ford Escort. Maybe.

              And I’m not saying it’s unfunny, I’m saying it’s a solid 90s sitcom that for some reason people are out here saying is the Model T of sitcoms. I feel like the level of hyperbole puts the burden of proof elsewhere.

              And it’s also not a case of it now being standard, because I assure you I’ve had this opinion since it was airing. I very much was of the batch of people who flip-flopped on Family Guy, but I was in the “Seinfeld was mid” camp before anybody ever called anything “mid”.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Generational labels tend to divide by arbitrary boundaries more than actually give you insightful information about something exclusive to the group.

    • abaddon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The years for Millennials go up to 94-96, Seinfeld finished in 98. I doubt many that young would have seen it. I was born in 86 and I barely watched Seinfeld re-runs.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The years for Millennials go up to 94-96

        ?? What do you think millennials were doing after 1996? Did they just phase out of existence?

        I was born in 86 and I barely watched Seinfeld re-runs.

        People had Seinfeld on in my college dorm during the mid-00s. It was one of the most syndicated shows of its era. If you remember 9/11, you remember Seinfeld.

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Seinfeld was hugely syndicated. I was born in the 90s and watched tons of reruns of it. I think they played it after or before the Simpsons which my family always watched.

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah same I watched reruns of Seinfeld every weeknight growing up from '98-05 at least if not later

      • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I was born in 84 and have seen every episode multiple times. Except the clip shows, because once you figure out that’s what’s happening you know better next time around and skip them.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s not like every millennial watched it growing up. It’s not inconceivable that there are millennials who are seeing it now for only the first time and find it offensive.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          My partner is a millennial and she had never seen Seinfeld until we first watched it together a few years ago. It’s not that inconceivable to imagine not everyone grew up watching the same things as you.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            No, it’s definitely fine and possible. A thriving industry of Youtube reaction channels hinges on that plausibility. It’s just the concept of the OP’s headline implying it’s a generational thing when it definitely isn’t.