*advancing her career

https://bsky.app/profile/aoc.bsky.social/post/3ldhxclo4wk2c

This is about AOC losing her bid for the Oversight committee to a geriatric Dem lifer. Sure she has systematically shredded any last bit of credibility with her triangulation, but hey, at least all the 5D polítical chess is paying off! She’s changing the system from the inside! It’s working this time!

Girl, you abandoned any pretense of doing working-class mass politics when you decided to do insider politics! Why are you tweeting like Bernie Sanders circa 2012? There’s no we! There’s no mass movement behind you! It’s just NYC DSA and some Warren libs (but I repeat myself)

  • Bureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.netEnglish
    19·
    5 days ago

    Neither governance model can achieve those goals.

    One of them actually did.

    I can literally pick every single one of those metrics and a quick search will debunk claims to each one for both systems.

    Funny how you haven’t done it.

    for example: you can’t eliminate illiteracy. there is a little thing called genetic defects, and brain damage which both can result in a person literally becoming incapable of literacy.

    Oh okay, you’re stupid stupid. This isn’t even debate-me-debate-me this is someone thinking they’re on the level of Shapiro

    So, yes. both systems are equally bad.

    “Because I decide to misinterpret what ‘eliminate illiteracy’ means, communism is just as bad as capitalism” centrist

    It’s a terrible argument, but considering you being… you, you don’t understand why. So let me put it in terms you can understand.
    You fool! You absolute little baby! You have failed to consider certain aspects of the argument, which is unsurprising given your proclivities. Let me debunk your retort real quick: You assume “illiterate” means “unable to read or write” while it can easily just mean “uneducated”. Silly goose.