I highly doubt 95.8% of the U.S. is literate. Or at least literate past the point of 'oh I know how to spell ‘car’".
Case in point, what in the world does the One Child Policy have to do with literacy rates? Are they implying that it isn’t possible to have high literacy rates in countries that have more children? That is an incredibly bold assumption and assertion, a real correlation doesn’t mean causation basic statistical problem. Such a random offshoot that would get you docked points on any essay as to whether or not you even are literate in the topic you are discussing.
Wait’ll you learn what this comment is actually in defense of! You ready? You’re not ready.
lol. child. neither governance model can achieve those goals. I can literally pick every single one of those metrics and a quick search will debunk claims to each one for both systems. some are trivially debunked. for example: you can’t eliminate illiteracy. there is a little thing called genetic defects, and brain damage which both can result in a person literally becoming incapable of literacy. but you know that’d require you having more than a 5 graders level of knowledge of the world.
So, yes. both systems are equally bad. communism requires a slave class just as much as capitalism does.
Emphasis mine. The bureaocracy is right. This kid is a walking tagline generator
Christ, another assertion that has very little to do with the topic at hand.
Also, ‘debunked’, I feel like I am on atheist/skeptic YouTube and Reddit again. Very much a walking tagline generator. It’s always weird when the community has one on the line and just keeps playing with it, the degeneration is always wild.
I highly doubt 95.8% of the U.S. is literate. Or at least literate past the point of 'oh I know how to spell ‘car’".
Case in point, what in the world does the One Child Policy have to do with literacy rates? Are they implying that it isn’t possible to have high literacy rates in countries that have more children? That is an incredibly bold assumption and assertion, a real correlation doesn’t mean causation basic statistical problem. Such a random offshoot that would get you docked points on any essay as to whether or not you even are literate in the topic you are discussing.
Real high-school liberal shit.
Wait’ll you learn what this comment is actually in defense of! You ready? You’re not ready.
Emphasis mine. The bureaocracy is right. This kid is a walking tagline generator
Would love to hear more about their thoughts on genetics and intelligence
Christ, another assertion that has very little to do with the topic at hand.
Also, ‘debunked’, I feel like I am on atheist/skeptic YouTube and Reddit again. Very much a walking tagline generator. It’s always weird when the community has one on the line and just keeps playing with it, the degeneration is always wild.