• Bernie2028
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m not justifying it. I’m only saying the title is a bit misleading/sensationalist.

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      At this point you really need to define what a “war” is because all you’re doing is dancing around without having to actually stake any claim to an argument. Instead of getting indignant at people drawing conclusions from what you DO say, make the substance of your opinion known so it can be examined and criticized openly.

      Explain what the difference is between having your military attack another country and a “congress didn’t say it’s a war but it’s really a war”.

      • Bernie2028
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        At this point you really need to define what a “war” is

        “a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state”

        Key word, “between.” You can’t have a war if no one declares war.

        • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You can’t have a war if no one declares war

          Are you just fucking with us now? Is this a bit?

          I’ve seen at least one other person gently remind you of the last 70 years of US history. Are you just being a troll at this point?

          I worded my question explicitly so as to make you think about this. Can you please try to?

          • Bernie2028
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Mexico wouldn’t be fighting back in this case (which is obviously bad, I’m just speaking semantically).