☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agoProvisioning decent living standards for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use, leaving a substantial surplus for other social investments.www.sciencedirect.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up185arrow-down12 cross-posted to: politics@beehaw.orgcollapse@lemm.eedegrowth@slrpnk.nettheory@hexbear.net
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-linkProvisioning decent living standards for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use, leaving a substantial surplus for other social investments.www.sciencedirect.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square7fedilink cross-posted to: politics@beehaw.orgcollapse@lemm.eedegrowth@slrpnk.nettheory@hexbear.net
minus-squareAvid Amoeba@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 days agoDefinition of decent living standard used in the paper.
minus-squareAvid Amoeba@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoIf I had to superimpose my feelings on top of this, I’d increase dwelling area to 80 sqm and laptops/computers to 2 per household. 🥲
Definition of decent living standard used in the paper.
Specifically from their table:
If I had to superimpose my feelings on top of this, I’d increase dwelling area to 80 sqm and laptops/computers to 2 per household. 🥲