• TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Great for dating files, too. We have an otherwise exceptionally inefficient routing chain at work, but we’re required to start each file with the date it was created (e.g. 20250101 Johnson Commendation) and it works beautifully for finding files and knowing how long they’ve sat in someone’s “bucket” even though a hard copy is being delivered office-to-office (but final memo needs to be signed digitally). sigh

  • sevan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m with OP, year-month-day is the superior format. Its consistently sortable, even as a text field (like with file names).

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      for storing/filing I agree but for normal use d-m-y makes more sense to me. it frontloads the most relevant information and you can cut it at either break and it could still be helpful, since one’s likely to remember the month they’re in and even more likely to remember the year. more significant is less relevant.

      h:m:a makes more sense for the opposite reason. less significant units of time become less relevant at that scale.

      in any case, ascending or descending is demonstrably better than whatever the fuck m-d-y is.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Theoretically, sure, but in reading and speech it doesn’t really matter if you’re comfortable with the format. If someone is going to say or write the full date you’re not going to interrupt them after they say the day or reflexively stop reading after two numbers. If they just want to say the day, that’s all they’ll say.

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        M-d-y is whats sounds the most natural when spoken in a casual setting. I feel like thats the only reason it got carried over to text. I definitely use m-d-y when talking, and as an american I also use it out of habit when writing, but I will agree that y-m-d is definitely best for text.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          but the spoken is based on the written format. you say January 2nd because that’s how you write it. if you wrote it the other way you’d say 2nd of January. you already use this sometimes, which I only assume as a remnant from a time your calendar wasn’t standardized as m-d-y yet, in “4th of July” for example.

        • slampisko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          M-d-y is whats sounds the most natural when spoken in a casual setting.

          That’s just habit. In my country we both write and pronounce dates as d-m-y and it’s just as natural for us as m-d-y is for you

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s very language dependant. I’m basque and we say things naturally. We do skip the year if it’s not relevant, but when we do say it, it comes first always.

          Urtarrilak 2.
          2025eko urtarrilak 2.

          In Spanish however it’s dd-mm-yyyy and sounds perfectly natural.

          2 de Enero.
          2 de enero de 2025

          You saying that your way sounds most natural when spoken is very pretentious because you assume that whats familiar to you is what’s most natural overall, but that’s just a generalisation of your own customs.

  • Mojave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The format of the date is somewhere around #9000 on my list of shit to worry about in real life.

      • NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah holiday is special but if you are at work and someone asks the day you say July 4th, just the way we learned

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      As always, it’s more conversational FOR YOU. You got used to it so it feels natural to you, I have two formats I’m used to just because I speak two different languages and they are perfectly conversational.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      It doesn’t matter how you say it, as long as it’s understandable. Same thing goes for writing it down.

      Only way to clear any confusion on the dates, is to use single standard which is why iso8601 exists.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most Germanic languages say “32” as “two-and-thirty”.

      Thankfully they did not hire Americans to figure out how to write Arab numerals, else we might have more conventions on how to write “86” than there are languages in Europe.

    • Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lots of places conversationally say ‘April 5th’, but when writing it out in an understandable format, DD/MM/YYYY logically increases in magnitude.

      If we used the ‘April 5th’ excuse, then Americans would be writing their times in mm:hh notation because people sometimes say ‘half past 12’.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        sometimes

        This is key. MM/DD is how they write it because it’s the most common (in America).

        But yeah, having a logical and practical way of writing the dates like the ISO standard would be best.