If they actually wanted to protect children, the answer is simple: reverse the responsibilities. Require porn sites to include metadata indicating it isn’t safe for minors. Require browsers to recognize that metadata, and filter out that content if parental controls are enabled. If parents are still too lazy to turn it on, make it default (like “safe search”, but more effective). The fact none of them have even suggested this is proof they don’t care about children or even porn, they just want to be seen as if they do.
Parental control software like Adguard or Adguard DNS family protection, filter out NSFW content like this website. A website doesn’t even need to do a thing for it to work.
They don’t care about anything other than watching you. They don’t care how old you are. That’s just an excuse.
Yeah I hate when the real topic gets buried in nonsense white noise. This is PURELY about collecting those IDs and data.
I hate purity culture.
In other news, VPN subscriptions have skyrocketed in the U.S South.
Honestly, it might be a good thing long-run to have a higher percentage of users on VPNs. They aren’t a magic cure-all, but they do help make it safer to use untrusted networks and discourage some things on the service side, like geolocating and data-mining users based on IP.
“This might address some security problems” is somewhat abstract to appeal to most users, I think. “VPN or no tits” is something that I think is more generally-relatable.
I’m worried it will lead to bans of those though too.
Not that they won’t try, but it’s very difficult to blanket ban VPNs. There are very legitimate business reasons to use them and it isn’t necessarily easy for ISPs to distinguish between a “recreational” VPN connection and an employee VPN’ing into say, a work datacenter. Industry will kick up a massive fuss about it.
Hell, I VPN into my home network all the time to access my self hosted work applications, it’s 10x more secure than leaving ports open to the wider internet.
Would be hilarious if they tried. I wouldn’t put it past them.
I was raised Rural. I can confirm.
I think that it’s kind of globally-applicable.
And I’ve wondered in the past whether the long-run for the Internet was always going to be people generally winding up with VPNs for similar reasons. I’m far from the first:
The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.
Or tor
Tor is too slow to watch videos. Wouldn’t wanna get interrupted in the middle of jerking off
This legislation was sponsored by NORD VPN
Join now for 50% off by using the promo code: REPUBLIC OF GILEAD
(or just sneak into your parents bedroom closet and watch the live show, if you are Alabamian)
The exact phrasing varies, but in most states, the details of the law are the same: Any “commercial entity” that publishes “material harmful to minors” online can be held liable—meaning, tens of thousands of dollars in fines and/or private lawsuits—if it doesn’t “perform reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of individuals attempting to access the material.”
Sure seems like that would cover a lot of websites, including most news sites.
Conservatism has been forcefully on the rise, but something like porn can cause it’s downfall. It reminds me of the videotape format wars end 70s, early 80s, with VHS pushing out Betamax due to porn.
This changed for blu-ray/HDDVD. It was payola that enabled Blu-ray to win.
This is devastating for my “southerners watching pornhub” kink.
Or does it make it more taboo and thus more appealing?
*turns to look at Alabama expectantly*
Yay, another paywall link
404 Media: we’re not like the rest. Except when we are.
I wouldn’t quite call it a paywall. This article is free with an email sign up. They discussed this before and not sure I believe it but their reason/excuse for free email sign up was to combat AI scrapers. They noticed their articles were getting scraped by a few well known AI scrape and repost “news” sites.
How long until somebody automates the scraping with throw-away email addresses?
Wrong question. How long ago, you mean.
That’s a bs reason, email paywall bypassing is so easy that it could just as well not exist.
Hence, no one watches porn anymore. /s
Praise be. By his hand. May the Lord open.
Gilead voted for this…
Temba, at rest.
Just wait till my VPN hears about this!
South of the border you can no longer watch films that go “South of the Border”.
Good thing there’s more than one porn website then I guess. Don’t tell them.
Its all porn, pornhub just prohibits itself from operating in states that pass this legislation.
The legislation in question requires you to prove you’re over 18 to enter these sites. Whether that’s through id or credit card info. However, this can lead to some pretty insane security issues. Just imagine if the id of every user along with their browsing data got leaked.
So instead, pornhub just refuses to operate in those states.
A surprising number of adult sites have been blocked. Most who abide by the block are the big branded companies. There are plenty who just ignore it, but those are mostly smaller aggregate sites that if one goes down, there are a dozen others just like it.
there’s so many! but which ones!?!
I’m not showing my driver’s license to any porn website, that’s stupid.
What a weird world to live in. Who would ever do that?
No one, and that’s probably the point. They can’t ban porn, but they can make it so terrible for both companies and viewers that the porn companies give up.
John Perry Barlow was right: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
Did he have a solution to the problem of online anarcho-capitalism?
Legalize recreational nukes, worldwide.
They all have cousins, so…
