hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-22 天前rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up1918arrow-down129file-text
arrow-up1889arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-22 天前message-square161fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-22 天前And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 天前And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.