• ShepherdPie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Why are people struggling with this so hard?

      • JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Because it’s a stupid, non standard way to say it. I understood it fine but I still thought it was a needless abbreviation.

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          K = kilo, which stands for 1000. It’s extremely standard. Saying it’s stupid is like saying $ or π or & or # or % is stupid.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Okay. I don’t typically get that caught up in the formatting of a number if the meaning is clear. 1k means 1000 in basically every context, and a unit indicator doesn’t make it more confusing to me. Are you likewise baffled by something being written as “1km”?

                • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  A percentage is a dimensionless number, but percent is still a unit. Just think about how you use it. Something can increase by 5 students, or it can increase by 15%.

                  Regardless, is “m” standing for a concrete measure and ”%” for a proportional one really the source of since confusion and anger? What about db, or decibel? It’s a measure of the ratio of quantities on a logarithmic scale, and is regularly applied to sound, electricity and other values. Is it as confusing?

      • three@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        It’s unnecessarily obtuse. In my opinion, 1000% would have made for a more impactful headline.

        • ShepherdPie
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Looks like that’s exactly how they wrote it in the original headline. Maybe OP hit the character limit for the title of the post.