• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    9 hours ago

    When will we start holding these people accountable? It is easy to say “corporations are bad” and then sit on your hands. It’s different to start calling out the people who ultimately make the corporations evil.

    We have whole classes of people comfortable fucking people over – sometimes with deadly consequences.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This shit is straight up evil, will the company be held accountable for their crimes? This is what our justice system is for. Based on what we know so far, more crimes would be bound to come out in an investigation.

    • Lon3star@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The justice system that just allowed a convicted criminal to run out the clock on a heinous crime and become president

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Even if they’re held to account there just gonna Texas two step and declare bankruptcy.

      And then spin up another subsidiary and start over,

      • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I wish it wasn’t the case. "Corporations are people too should go both ways… Death penalty if you do evil enough crimes.

    • datavoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      From where I’m sitting, the justice system seems to be more interested in investigating poor individuals than rich companies. I can’t think of many modern examples of rich companies (or even people) being held accountable for something that didn’t involve stealing from other rich people.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There’s examples but they aren’t proportional. Oh, a company with 3 billion in revenue poisoned the water supply for a whole county? Let’s fine them $10 million.

        That definitely teaches them a lesson about consequences, except the lesson is that they don’t matter.

    • Vertelleus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      US Government: Best I can do is a slap on the wrist to the tune of about 0.0000001% of their yearly profits and a hardy, “don’t do that.”

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    So people are going to jail over this and proper hard measures are going to be taken to address the obvious imbalance of power that allows companies like this to do this over and over again right? They’re not just going to give the company another slap on the wrist fine that won’t even cover how much money they’ve stolen from people, leaving them still making a profit for doing this and leaving the door wide open for more abuse like that to happen over and over again, right?

    Right?

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    UnitedHealth, employer of slain exec Brian Thompson

    Not quite correct sort of. This is OptumRx, which is owned by United Health Group, which also owns United Health Care, which Brian Thompson was nominally the CEO of. In other words, this is like the sibling of the company Brian Thompson ran.

    To be clear, Brian Thmpson wasn’t a billionaire, he was a mid-level at best millionaire worth only $41 million. He was just another star-bellied prole who thought he was in the aristocracy.

    Point being, the whole thing is stupid. The health care system, the people getting rich off it, Luigi’s reaction to it, our reactions to it, the media’s reporting on it, all of it.

    • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      What part about our reaction, or Luigi’s, is stupid? Is it maybe, just maybe, totally justifiable anger?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      As many people here can tell you, I am not cheering on the idea of assassinating CEOs as a way of making systemic change because I simply do not think it will work.

      That said, I 100% sympathize with Luigi Mangione and I 100% understand exactly why he did what he did. He was driven to the breaking point by a heartless company that, like all healthcare companies and, in fact, all for-profit companies in America that put their profits over human health and life.

      He was desperate and driven to the brink of madness by the system that should have been helping him. Of course he did what he did. I’m honestly amazed someone hadn’t done it sooner.

      I still don’t think it will solve a damn thing, and neither will killing a half dozen more healthcare CEOs if that happens, but I will totally understand if it happens again and likely sympathize with the killer.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      What are you trying to say? That you could do a better job then Luigi?

      Brian Thompson was accessible and his location was known. Probably why Luigi allegedly went after him.

  • DancingBear
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Americans love their health insurance providers

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Please don’t violate LW’s ToS. Be aware of what you’re posting publicly. This is not a bar with your friends. This is the internet where things are recorded forever and can possibly link back to you/us with consequences. It’s not that hard to express yourself without breaking the rules.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      What did they do that broke ToS? It looks like the post may have been edited

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Nothing yet. I’m just hoping people think a little before they do things to get banned/removed. The rules are for everyone’s benefit.

        This is a post that will rightfully make people angry.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah, it turns out threats of terrorism can look bad for you if they’re ever uncovered.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Serinus is correct. They are rules to the benefit of everyone who wishes Lemmy.world to stay up which, since you’re here, presumably includes you.

            The server is in The Netherlands. The Netherlands does not have freedom of speech. Calling for violence is illegal there.

            If mods left calls for violence up all the time, there’s a good chance Lemmy.world could get shut down. Considering how much you participate here, I’m guessing you would not care for that.

            Edit: Always love it when this explanation gets downvotes but the downvoters don’t actually chime in and say that yeah, they’d be fine if Lemmy.world gets shut down as long as they get to say what they want, when they want, wherever they want. Maybe if you just admitted it instead of getting pissed off at someone pointing out that speech can have negative consequences…

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Always love it when this explanation gets downvotes but the downvoters don’t actually chime in and say that yeah, they’d be fine if Lemmy.world gets shut down as long as they get to say what they want, when they want, wherever they want. Maybe if you just admitted it instead of getting pissed off at someone pointing out that speech can have negative consequences

              Why, when you understand the meaning with a simple downvote?

              Don’t call a place .world and then host it somewhere with pathetic laws regarding the main topic of the website: speech. Well, unless you want everyone else to rightfully call out the stupidity and patheticness of such a move

              There’s your reply

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Ohhhh. That makes more sense now. Thank you for clarifying :)