• ShepherdPie
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Why are people struggling with this so hard?

        • JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Because it’s a stupid, non standard way to say it. I understood it fine but I still thought it was a needless abbreviation.

          • P1nkman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            K = kilo, which stands for 1000. It’s extremely standard. Saying it’s stupid is like saying $ or π or & or # or % is stupid.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Okay. I don’t typically get that caught up in the formatting of a number if the meaning is clear. 1k means 1000 in basically every context, and a unit indicator doesn’t make it more confusing to me. Are you likewise baffled by something being written as “1km”?

                  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    A percentage is a dimensionless number, but percent is still a unit. Just think about how you use it. Something can increase by 5 students, or it can increase by 15%.

                    Regardless, is “m” standing for a concrete measure and ”%” for a proportional one really the source of since confusion and anger? What about db, or decibel? It’s a measure of the ratio of quantities on a logarithmic scale, and is regularly applied to sound, electricity and other values. Is it as confusing?

        • three@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          It’s unnecessarily obtuse. In my opinion, 1000% would have made for a more impactful headline.

          • ShepherdPie
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Looks like that’s exactly how they wrote it in the original headline. Maybe OP hit the character limit for the title of the post.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Yeah 1000% is 10x but they were charged 11x what they should have paid. Overcharged by (over) 10x.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        11 times what they should have paid unless you think that “overcharging by 100%” would be charging exactly the right price or if you feel that all medication should be free somewhat cheaper. Or more expensive. Whichever way the math works for that.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          They were charged 11x what they should have paid. they were overcharged 10x, because they would still have been expected to pay the original (1x) charge.

          The 1k% refers to the overcharge, so they are technically correct.