• Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There are scientifically more than two sexes. Something like 1-2% of all people are intersex.

    • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’d think that, but really, I suspect a lot of the confusion comes from the word itself. “Intersex” implies with its “inter-” prefix that something exists between the two sexes, thus implying the existence of a third (or more) sex.

      But again, it’s just a blanket term that covers a wide variety of medical conditions related to development of sex organs/characteristics.

      And I shouldn’t have to say this, but of course I’m not saying that one’s anatomy has any influence on one’s worth as a person. I’m not a monster. I’m just a stickler for semantic accuracy.

      • LukeZaz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m not a monster. I’m just a stickler for semantic accuracy.

        For what reason? What use does it have? Because as it stands, you’re arguing in favor of a false dichotomy that, though you may be against them, is still used by bigots to justify their hate. Weighed against “semantic accuracy,” I don’t really think that’s worthwhile.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They will call it “multisex” and come up with treatments to “fix” the “medical issue”.