• Default_Defect
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Kinda weird that its only an echo chamber when it leaves out the right.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Someone with the privilege of not belonging to a group that fascists wants to exterminate from the planet, apparently.

                • reksas@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  That is good point. But it requires for them to want to engage in honest discussion and not just spew useless crap they have filled their heads with. And worst ones are incapable of that.

            • Solumbran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              You can consider the nazi point of view (do you really need to though?) without defending nazis’ right to spew their bullshit.

              And let’s face it, even if lemmy was 100% leftists, the rest of the world is fascist as fuck so it’ll never be an echo chamber.

                • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Fascism implies hate speech, and that’s what the “right” is all about in most countries right now.

                  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    I feel like this is exactly the sort of thing that makes the guy on the right in the comic feel the way he does. Call enough random people Nazis as hyperbole and you can boy-who-cried-wolf your way into being ignored when they’re genuinely at it in full view (aka Musk the other day).

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Enjoy your echo chamber, must be nice when there’s no-one that has a different opinion or disagrees with you.

          So how I feel about this depends somewhat on which platform I’m on, but why do some try to paint it as a virtue to allow ourselves to be surrounded by toxicity?

          I can be aware of what is happening in the world and engaged with people who have different opinions than I have without having to let them pollute the places where I just want to be able to exist without harassment and assholery. I can also make different decisions about how insular I want to be on one platform vs another. I don’t have to let those people into my life, and I frankly find it kind of offensive when folks suggest that I or others are somehow missing out by not letting them in.

          No one should feel obligated to let themselves be the target of hateful rhetoric or comments that hurt them or bring negativity into their lives. Choosing to allow that is a valid choice, but it’s not necessarily a healthy one, and choosing not to allow it is a reasonable choice for people to make for themselves for the sake of their own health or happiness.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Why? Why is it a virtue of some kind if when I go online I allow the same people to continually make that experience worse for me?

              Choosing to allow that is a valid choice, but it’s not necessarily a healthy one, and choosing not to allow it is a reasonable choice for people to make for themselves for the sake of their own health or happiness.

              Social media isn’t the entire world. Personally blocking the people I don’t want to interact with on specific platforms (or even all platforms) doesn’t remove my ability to interact with the world and the events going on within it, nor does it remove my ability to hear other opinions.

              Edited to add - I fully support someone such as yourself choosing to NOT block people. But I don’t like that we’re normalizing the idea that we all just have to accept what is coming to us from social media in the name of “considering other opinions”, nor that doing so is inherently virtuous. I can consider other opinions and create an online environment for myself that is not toxic.

        • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          “You just don’t like people with different opinions about what types of humans should be eradicated. Not me, willing to have all sorts of conversations about ranking people in terms of who is subhuman.”