• theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, the current situation is beyond double standards. The Republicans have free reign to more or less break any of their own rules and suffer almost no consequences. Meanwhile, literally anything a Democrat does is spun into multiple mutually exclusive conspiracy theories that their base and the media somehow manage to spout simultaneously.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Not to mention leftists will latch onto it too and repeat the lie everywhere yet swear up and down that they voted for the Democrat even though they shit on them any time they open their mouth.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whoever succeeds trump, (assuming that happens, and it’s not Vance), should do the same thing, so we can maybe get rid of that dumbass tradition.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      “we separate church and state” Church throwing bibles at every god damn state and court event and making people swear on them.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    He was probably afraid of getting struck by divine lightning or something like that if he touched a Bible while uttering the words with no intentions to follow them.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s the ceremony organizers’ fault for neglecting to bring a bible small enough to put his hand on.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It is absolutely not a requirement to swear an oath on a bible, or even to have a bible nearby.

    It just happens to be a longstanding custom in the USA. Many politicians take the oath on a bible just for the optics. DT, of all people, is all about optics. Dude probably wasn’t paying any attention, and surely winging his swearing given the last minute changes.

    In any case, shouldn’t everyone be applauding a president for refusing to touch a bible, tacitly denouncing religious contexts near government?

  • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sadly I think it would have been more than half. Personally I’d like less of the Bible in any of our swear ins, but Orange Hitler not doing it just keeps the process rolling forward.

    • sfxrlz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      „Made it federal law that biology exists“ is such a gross, yet ironic misrepresentation of the actual matter it’s actually funny

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Um, the sheer irony of even the “biology exists” part of what you said is that any biologist will tell you how factually incorrect his law is.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Lmao I’ve been told that “at least it’s a more coherent and accurate description of gender than the last administration had”

        And like, no, it’s inaccurate and incoherent. How do you define “the sex that produces the large reproductive cell” if someone never produced that cell? Are infertile people sexless, or is there some other sex characteristic that’s more reliable than gamete production? If there is, why not use that as a metric instead?

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just the childish act of crossing your fingers when you make a promise. He didn’t put his hand on the Bible because he isn’t planning on presiding faithfully, and he has absolutely no intention whatsoever to preserve, protect or defend the Constitution of the United States unless it benefits him personally at the time.