• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The point I was illustrating is that USAID is and always was a tool of the CIA.

    USAID is absolutely equipped to tell the Israeli military “We’re not going to give you one of our trucks and a landing pad for a blackhawk at our pier”.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How are they equipped to do that? Are you going to stand there in the way of an army with your clipboard?

      And I’m sorry but Internet access and social media doesn’t evoke scary secret agent the way you’re trying to use it. At best it’s the furthest extent of soft power, which is USAID’s purpose. At worst it’s an unsanctioned covert program that got shut down and swept under the rug.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, they are equipped to not hand over their resources. They’re also equipped to not lie and cover it up afterwords.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Okay so a few things here. USAID wasn’t even on that side of the delivery system, that was WFP. Far from covering it up, the raid was headline news and is covered in an OIG report on the pier. Finally, USAID is not a military organization. If a military unit lands near them and demands a truck they are going to hand it over. They do not possess weapons or training. This entire line of argument is ridiculous.