We measured self-reported meat consumption, meat disgust (by self-report and Implicit Association Test),
IAT is phrenology of social studies. You can discard it as garbage. If a study is using IAT as methodology, it’s garbage done to gain some publication points.
Been vegan for going on five years and I’ve never experienced this tbh
That’s called an anecdote and I’ve got one, too: I stopped eating red meat and now I don’t find beef or lamb appetizing at all.
Seems like it doesn’t happen to everyone and the article agrees with that
A study on a group of 40 is an anecdote at best, a waste of resources at worst.
Reporting on it in on a big news website should be a crime, as it’s just a clickbait.
The article also site other studies too. (It calls the N=40 preliminary early research)
From another study with N=700:
IAT is phrenology of social studies. You can discard it as garbage. If a study is using IAT as methodology, it’s garbage done to gain some publication points.
You can read more about IAT: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000778
Tends to doesn’t means always will ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Tendies?
? Are you’re saying that no one could be disgusted? Because plenty of people have moral disgust there which what this article is primarily about
I assume it’s a reference to the breaded strips of Chicken