• CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    What I keep getting held up on is that if the science keeps pointing toward the same conclusion, how do you actually apply those to society? How to you convince the voting masses to institute these changes? Because the average person won’t accept repealing things like three strikes and minimum sentencing, they just assume that a “tough on crime” attitude is the way to go. If a politician comes along offering justice system reform, he’d never make it into office because people would assume he’d be letting criminals run rampant unpunished.

    Related, I’ve heard people argue against UBI by saying that it would just make people lazy and not want to work at all.

    • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Honestly, I think it would require being raised in a society where social welfare is the norm before it can be considered ordinary.

      It would take a revolution with people of vision in order to create a social welfare society. Similar to the Founding Fathers of America, where people of intelligence, character, and spine agreed that a change must be made. We will need people who can fight like hell to lead us into battle, and coolheaded types who will spend a great deal of midnight oil on drafting and workshopping a new way of living.

      It won’t be easy nor intuitive, but the crisis caused by Yarvin’s Cabal might be the kindling we need for people to give up on the way we have lived. After all, the old ways are dying with the Constitution. When cowardice offers no shelter, all that is left is to fight.