Kennedy’s hearing signifies how close a man with medically racist beliefs is to becoming the US’s leading health official

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Actually how it start with black people. Classical race science was invented to prove how black people had thicker skulls and felt less pain in order to excuse slavery.

    Fun fact “The origin of species” is only half of the name of Darwins book. Don’t ask about the other half.

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life

      Do you think Darwin meant this in an aspirational or observational way?

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “Favored Races” does not mean “white people.” “Favored races” = “selected species.”

        This reminds me of weird creationist canards. Darwin is not responsible for social Darwinism, and distanced himself from it. He was talking about finches and tortoises.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s not talking about Darwin’s views though, that’s talking about how scientific racism adapted and distorted Darwinism.

          Darwin was against slavery and connected to several abolitionists. Darwin never really promoted social Darwinism, and his writings point out how human society does take care of its weak/those who would not otherwise survive.

          Slavery, although in some ways beneficial during ancient times, is a great crime; yet it was not so regarded until quite recently, even by the most civilized nations. And this was especially the case, because the slaves belonged in general to a race different from that of their masters. As barbarians do not regard the opinion of their women, wives are commonly treated like slaves.

          Like these are not the words of an evil sexist pro slavery eugenicist. I would not argue that Darwin wasn’t sexist or racist at all - it’s the 1800s, they all are - but Darwin is not responsible for eugenics/social Darwinism.

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 minutes ago

            The article I linked previously was the top result this one might be slightly better it contains some quotes

            Indeed, he articulated this same principle in his scientific study of human evolution, The Descent of Man (1871), where he claimed, “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races.”

            Not only racism, but racial extermination was an integral feature of Darwin’s theory from the start.

            There is more this is only a small part. Darwin also had passion for misoginy