Not really. Just needs to be barley, hops and yeast.
EDIT: Misread “booze” as “beer”. I would agree that booze seems to imply intoxication. Non-alcoholic spirits do exist though and are pretty awesome if one enjoys the sensory experience of cocktails but wants to avoid intoxication for whatever reason.
Isn’t nonalcoholic booze an oxymoron?
Not really. Just needs to be barley, hops and yeast.
EDIT: Misread “booze” as “beer”. I would agree that booze seems to imply intoxication. Non-alcoholic spirits do exist though and are pretty awesome if one enjoys the sensory experience of cocktails but wants to avoid intoxication for whatever reason.
I would say calling it booze is the problem, not calling it beer.
“Booze,” at least to me, implies you’ll get drunk if you drink it. Plenty of people can have a beer and not even get tipsy.
Just looking up the definition of the word, ‘intoxicating’ and ‘alcoholic’ is what dictionaries use to describe it.
Yeah. Agreed. I misread as “non-alcoholic beer”.