• RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Does it fight algorithm addiction or does it just utilise existing algorithm addiction to give you something slightly more informative?

  • portuga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I too find this such a nice refreshing take on wikipedia. It’s only been a few days, hope the developer improves it further. I realize some kind of recommendation algorithm opens a pandora’s box, but one can dream

    • Comalnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      One big thing i hope they add is sorting by topic, so i can have a biology feed, a physics feed…

  • RedSnt@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s actually really cool. I like that the dev has expressed that he doesn’t want to make the algorithm addictive and just keep it random 😅

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Would be cool if the official Wikipedia mobile app integrated this functionality! It does have a ‘random articles’ card, but it’s nothing like this.

    Not sure ‘addiction’ is being defeated here, though 😆 Like if I’m addicted to sausages, giving me bacon instead isn’t really solving the root of the issue. The issue being those sexy, sexy pigs.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      The addiction isn’t being defeated, it’s just being redirected from something worthless to something useful. Well, at least less useless.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    endless feed

    to fight algorithm addiction

    endless

    feed

    to fight algorithm addiction

    Uuuuuh that’s not the way to fight an addiction, right? Who is this person working for, exactly?

      • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Ironically, my overly chatty doctor was ranting about how methadone is a racket and they string people along for years instead of titrating them off. He prescribes Suboxone, apparently.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Well, there has to be some kind of algorithm. Even picking a random Wikipedia article technically is an algorithm, just not one that adapts to the user

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 hours ago

          True, but outside CS the word has come to refer to a certain brand of complex heuristics or ML inference.

        • fox2263@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          An algorithm usually involves lots of complex calculations and weights. Picking a number from a pool of numbers at random is as simple as it gets.

          • b_n@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            In comsci, there are no real random numbers. They are all seeded psuedo-random number algorithms. (Unless you integrate with some third party random as a service setup)

            • fox2263@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Yes but the common interpretation of “the algorithm” is that of the social media and YouTube style one. Recommending items of interest etc but easily manipulated by bad actors.

              Wiki random is about as opposite to that as possible.

            • weker01@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              That’s a common misconception. You can measure a lot of ambient noise and extract entropy. Like time between inputs or how long it took an HDD to seek.

              Most modern PC CPUs even have dedicated hardware for generating random numbers from electrical ambient noise. I don’t trust them however.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Most “apps” are just http web hooks to a regular website backend with extra tracking telemetry. So a website working as a PWA should be enough for everyone.

      I hate how everything has to be a fucking app, because it doesn’t need to be.

      • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If phone OSes made it so there’s less friction to save a web page as an icon on your desktop it would help to resolve that issue I think.

        • flames5123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s so easy, even on iOS. Just tap share and add to Home Screen. It’s probably just as easy on android.

          • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yep, you’re 100% right. Not sure why I thought it was high friction. I feel like I confused trying to put an icon for an image on my home screen (gym app’s sign in QR code) with sending a web page to the home screen.

          • C A B B A G E@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s very easy.

            Chrome let’s you do “install” websites to home screen, Firefox allows saving shortcuts to home screen.

            The annoying thing is that you can’t save them to the app drawer (at least on vanilla android), so if you have a clean home screen you have to sacrifice that.

        • kiagam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          Proper PWA websites save very well to phone home screens (like voyager for Lemmy!)

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s just two taps in browser to get it on home screen.

    • MrSilkworm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      On android:

      1. Open link in Firefox.
      2. Tap the three dots.
      3. Tap “add to start screen”

      There’s your app!

      • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        On iOS through Safari:
        Tap the Share icon
        Scroll down a little.
        Add to Home Screen.
        Profit?

  • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I see the dev don’t want recommendation algorithm. All good to avoid the recommendation bubble, but a category/tags might be nice instead of random everything.

  • GluWu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Saw this posted in a ADHD com a few days back. Every comment was just like “oh no…”. I opened it and like 20 minutes later realized, oh no. I can and have spent many entire days just reading Wikipedia and following linked subjects. So much so I run out in areas. I can’t handle a lot of visual and audio stimulation, short form content is such a nightmare for me, can’t watch it. But give me pages of the most dense info and I’m hooked. I just need the option to download every paper referenced from every Wikipedia page I visit.