GenAI can inhibit critical engagement with work and can potentially lead to long-term overreliance on the tool and diminished skill for independent problem-solving.

Analysing 936 real-world GenAI tool use examples our participants shared, we find that knowledge workers engage in critical thinking primarily to ensure the quality of their work, e.g. by verifying outputs against external sources. Moreover, while GenAI can improve worker efficiency, it can inhibit critical engagement with work and can potentially lead to long-term overreliance on the tool and diminished skill for independent problem-solving. Higher confidence in GenAI’s ability to perform a task is related to less critical thinking effort. When using GenAI tools, the effort invested in critical thinking shifts from information gathering to information verification; from problem-solving to AI response integration; and from task execution to task stewardship. Knowledge workers face new challenges in critical thinking as they incorporate GenAI into their knowledge workflows. To that end, our work suggests that GenAI tools need to be designed to support knowledge workers’ critical thinking by addressing their awareness, motivation, and ability barriers.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    You see, an alternative way to make your AI pass the Turing test is just to use it to make all humans more stupid.

  • Famko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do you think this is the reason why so much money is being poured into generative AI by tech bros and now the US government? Lessening the critical thinking skills of people who use it, which is a lot of people by now, so that they don’t worry about what unethical things companies or the government does?

    Something to think about, I suppose.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. But I think I have a better viewpoint - they want to insert a blackbox mechanism between all our interactions.

      A computer can be an instrument, a set of tools for our mind to do powerful things.

      What such AIs do is to insert an easy to use layer between us and all those tools. A computer here encompasses computer networks, including global ones, and human communication over them. So even between us and all the world.

      So ultimately it’s a way to create Matrix. To control what we think, to control how things we want done are done. To intercept both outgoing and inbound signals, or falsify them.

      I don’t think this is even a question, when the world has a few dominating parties, they will want to exercise such control. It’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s how governments and huge companies and have functioned for all of history. Because humans are apes and when in power positions, should be brought down to sinful earth.

      • Famko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess we should watch out for when they make an AI based VR “experience” then. That’ll definitely turn into a Matrix like situation.

        (Assuming it doesn’t turn into complete garbage like that AI Minecraft experiment.)

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nah, I think they’ve started with the most important part - text, specifically search. There were search engines which, while still honest, gave you direct access to sources in exchange for your time. There were search engines already dishonest, but still giving you that, just distorted. This integrates what could be scraped for you, so you can be fed any flavor of opinions and you’ll consume that.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if there were articles like this when the pocket calculator came out.

    • yogsototh@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      If men learn this, it will implant forgetfulness in their souls. They will cease to exercise memory because they rely on that which is written, calling things to remembrance no longer from within themselves, but by means of external marks.

      Plato against writing

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      There are studies about how other tools reduced various capacities. Our memory capacity has decreased and how we use it has changed. People used to store a lot of information, now we only store a sort of index (we remember where to look it up, not the information itself). Our attention span has also greatly decreased with the shift to short form content (not a useful tool, but just another cognitive change).

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It did! But we also ended up being more efficient per grey-matter mass.

        FTA

        This reduction in brain size however does not mean that modern humans are less intelligent. Human brains have evolved to work more efficiently and utilize less energy.

    • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      except calculators function as a disability aid if you have discalculia and actually foster your math skills instead of hallucinating a wrong result for your input

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t use the fancy autocomplete. I ask the AI to generate a boilerplate with X framework/language. Then I’ll ask it to stub in whatever major features I know I’ll want, maybe ask it for a handful of libraries.

      Initial setup is all busy work.

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      How fancy we talking? The most my fancy IDE tools extend to is like creating functions for me or creating a loop and junk like that. It’s not writing any of my code more than autocorrect is writing an essay for me.

  • MonkeyTown
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve only used genAI once, to re-write my resume. (And I played with image generation to sort of see what it can do and be a muse for me because I’m aphantasic, but I was wiiiiiildly disappointed.)

    It spit out something less good than what I fed into it, hallucinated a ton of skills and experience I don’t have, and it looked like AI slop when it was done. So a lose-lose.

    Might be good for people who don’t know things or who can’t write for shit (so your average first year college student, IME) but… honestly it’s garbage if you aren’t average or below already. So I’m not surprised it’s ruining people’s ability to function.

    Ai is a tool for dumb people (sorry. not sorry.) to land good jobs that dumb people shouldn’t hold or be hiring for, and that’s about it.