• frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We all have to rely on somebody to be an expert in fields outside our own. Years ago, if Elon said “Falcon 9 launch yesterday failed due to xyz”, I assumed he had the actual experts giving him notes. The Xhitter debacle showed how much he doesn’t listen to those people.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s kind of funny, but we all do this to some extent. I used to think most people on Reddit were super smart. If someone says stuff with authority, then it’s easy to believe what they’re saying and assume they know what they’re talking about.

      But then every once in a while, I’d come across a topic that I know deeply about - and the comment would just be blatantly wrong, but still have tons of up votes. It really made me start second guessing all the other comments I had read and thought were smart, but it’s an easy trap to fall into.

      I guess what I’m really saying, is that you all are a bunch of morons, probably.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I just dont get why you have to assume that though?

      Maybe I’m a pessimist, but I’ve met and worked with enough humans that I think the best assumtion is that they’re all full of shit until they prove otherwise.

      It’s fine to rely on experts for some things, but if those experts aren’t subject to independent scrutiny or directly independent of the claim or sunjecy under test, or can’t give clear testable /replicable evidence, I’d just not put much weight on their testimony as a source of evidence.