Summary
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that restoring Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “unrealistic,” signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward negotiated settlements.
Speaking at NATO headquarters, he argued that pursuing full territorial recovery would prolong the war and emphasized the need for security guarantees without NATO membership or U.S. troops in Ukraine.
Hegseth outlined Trump’s approach of reducing Russian war funding through increased U.S. energy production while shifting more military support responsibility to Europe.
Lol sorry, every nation in Europe is a sovereign entity and is responsible for the safety of their citizens and the integrity of their borders.
Poland made the decision to arm itself and has been spending for years. Lack of investment in the military is fundamentally a national decision to divert money into other programs or tax cuts.
The US has been becoming less and less interested in the rules based order we built after WW2 for the last 20 years.
Many people have predicted this would happen. You have only yourselves to blame.
Your first sentence is laughably false. It’s like you don’t have a clue the eu exists.
The problem is a HUGE part of our economy and the world economy depends on this spending. Musk and Trump are fucking morons who are actively destroying the US economy and strength.
I don’t like what you said but sadly it is true - we should have invested much more in the defence and start permanent sanctions on Russia since Chechnya war.
That doesn’t distract from the fact that Trump is a cunt working hand in hand with Putler.
I 100% agree.
For at least the next 4 years I would not count on the US honoring any security arrangements. Any intelligence shared with us is likely going to be passed to Russia.
I honestly wouldn’t have completely counted on the US before that either. Countries don’t have friends and they all only work for themselves.
While there are groups that are often going in the same direction, you can’t just count on others. Each deal is unique, and each treaty can be broken at any time. The US move when it’s in their interest to do so. But should their local political situation be tense, or if there’s nothing to gain, it’s much less obvious IMO. And of course, at the moment, it’s quite likely that most treaties will just be put to the shredder.