Thats how they are gonna do it. The next election is going to be a sham one. They are going to rig it in their favor. Every fucking state shouls be going back to paper ballots
Of course the next election will be a sham. I keep asking people who think there will be legitimate elections in the U.S. from now on why the Republicans would ever give up controlling the entire federal government, āThey just wouldā seems to be the answer.
But just legitimate-looking enough that Americans cannot seek political asylum abroad because you show up in the EU and the border agents be like ātHE uSa iS a dEMocRACyā, and you get deported back to the US, and then the US border agents will refuse to recognize your citizenship, and you end up in guantanamo.
Theyāve always been sham elections, theyāre just pulling down the curtains that kept most folks believing in the lie.
Really? This sham got both Jimmy Carter and Donald Trump in the Oval Office?
I guess the Illuminati donāt have much of a plan.
The states run the elections. There is nothing stopping the states from hiring cyber security professionals to make sure their elections are secure. Most state elections are still run by very competent people who are motivated to provide a free and fair election.
We get a ābloody kansasā moment with federal and state officials fighting each other.
I think if the feds tried to take over elections it would just be bloody feds.
Every fucking state does have paper ballots.
Uhh, no they do not.
I have no option in Georgia for a paper ballot. I do it on a touchscreen computer each time. Yes that gets printed after i Digitally do it but not in an easy to read way. Then i put it into a bin that scans it and shreds it. No paper trail.
The bin does not shred it.
But yeah the qr code being whatās scanned but the text being what you can read seriously compromises voter verifiability. So close, but not voter verifiable. Close enough to fool people.
Thatās a paper ballot
A digital that is printed and then shredded is not a paper ballot.
A paper ballot is a paper I vote on. That stays intact for historical accuracy.
From your stance I am invincible. I have not died in the last five minutes therefore i am invincible.
no that is very much a paper ballot. The historical record part isnāt important.
But it is. Otherwise if the voting machine has an error, the paper it prints out has the wrong info, at that point there is no validation that can occur via recount or any other means.
Or heaven forbid something in the software allows it to print the right vote but record the wrong vote. Iām with you: no paper trail = not a paper ballot.
Wellā¦ Good then!
Seriously though, i hadnt considered that my balot gets saved even though its scanned by a machine.
Yours does but not everywhere has a paper trail
Not true lol
As of the 2024 election all but a handful of counties in Texas and Louisiana have returned to paper. The Brennan Center for Justice estimates 98 percent of ballots were cast with paper records.
Impressive! As the article says:
This represents an increase fromĀ 93 percent of votesĀ four years ago.
Didnāt realize it had improved so much
Counterexample?
Ballots are controlled by counties. You can Google it?
Man I really hate these website where you have to have a subscription to read the article.
Every fucking conservative piece of shit toiletpaper rag is free, but anything to the left of these whether itās liberal or even socialist is all pay to read.
Hereās the archive.org version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250215031214/https://www.wired.com/story/cisa-election-security-freeze-memo/
EDIT:
FUUUUUUU even the archive.org version has this javascript shit that hides the article. wtf!!!
EDIT2:
I added an extension to disable javascript for specific websites and I can now read it.
Every fucking conservative piece of shit toiletpaper rag is free, but anything to the left of these whether itās liberal or even socialist is all pay to read.
Did you consider that it might be because one is actual journalism and thus requires a lot of time and effort to perform, while the other one is petulant, bigoted crying in a way that a high schooler could write with zero or minimal fact-checking in 20 minutes?
Yes of course. Doesnāt mean we shouldnāt have access to that information.
Where I live, (QuĆ©bec) we have LaPresse, LeDevoir, LaTribune/LeSoleil/LeQuotidien/etc which are an information coop, which are all free but have the option to have a paid subscription or rather to support the paper. Thereās also tons of special federal and provincial measures to financially support journalism in Canada.
But I forget this is the US.
And, obviously, the parasitic āelitesā are now than happy to sink whatever costs are necessary to spread their fear based propaganda.
Thatās because their interests align with the mega-rich. They can afford to give away content and hire interns to sexually harass. Honest orgs have little funding by comparison.
Good point
Use archive.is
way better than archive.org
FYI, uBlock with Annoyances: EasyList - Annoyances enabled did the trick for me.
I was generally happy with uBlock before, but then I found the dashboard and checked all the boxes for Annoyances and oh man! So much better!
Edit: Oh, bit thank you for the warning! You know, when I was younger I honestly thought the <flash> HTML tag was the worstā¦I kinda miss it now, isnāt that fucked up?! But, I mean, in comparisonā¦
I was generally happy with uBlock before, but then I found the dashboard and checked all the boxes for Annoyances and oh man! So much better!
Soā¦ can you hook a guy up with info on this?
This might work for you
Thanks
What, they put him in jail? How was he forced?
They probably locked him out of computer systems and stopped paying him. Thatās pretty forceful.
I didnāt read anything about putting anyone in jail or being arrested. Where did you see this?
If heās not in jail, then he should continue supervising elections.
Ahh, typical MAGAt logic. Our elections are corruptā¦ So of course that means we have to remove the departments that ensure integrity in our elections.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has frozen all of its election security work and is reviewing everything it has done toĀ help state and local officials secure their electionsĀ for the past eight years, WIRED has learned. The move represents the first major example of the countryās cyberdefense agency accommodating President Donald Trumpās false claims of election fraud and online censorship.
In a memo sent Friday to all CISA employees and obtained by WIRED, CISAās acting director, Bridget Bean, said she was ordering āa review and assessmentā of every position at the agency related to election security andĀ countering mis- and disinformation, āas well as every election security and [mis-, dis-, and malinformation] product, activity, service, and program that has been carried outā since the federal governmentĀ designatedĀ election systems as critical infrastructure in 2017.
āCISA will pause all elections security activities until the completion of this review,ā Bean added. The agency is also cutting off funding for these activities atĀ the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing & Analysis Center, a group funded by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that has served as a coordinating body for the elections community.
In her memo, Bean confirmed that CISA had, asĀ first reported by Politico, placed employees āinitially identified to be associated with the elections security activities and the MDM programā on administrative leave on February 7.
āIt is necessary to rescope the agencyās election security activities to ensure CISA is focused exclusively on executing its cyber and physical security mission,ā she told employees in the memo.
While Bean is temporarily leading CISA, she is officially the agencyās executive director, its top career position. CISAās first directorĀ created the executive-director roleĀ to provide continuity during political transitions. Previously, Bean was a Trump appointeeĀ at the Federal Emergency Management AgencyĀ during his first term.
In justifying CISAās internal review, which will conclude on March 6, Bean pointed toĀ Trumpās January 20 executive orderĀ on āending federal censorship.āĀ Conservatives have arguedĀ that CISA censored their speech by coordinating with tech companies to identify online misinformation in 2020, during the final year of Trumpās first term. CISA has denied conducting any censorship, and the US Supreme CourtĀ dismissed a lawsuitĀ over the governmentās work. But in the wake of the backlash, CISAĀ halted most conversationsĀ with tech platforms about online mis- and disinformation.
CISA and DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Since 2017, state and local election officials have relied on CISAās expertise and resourcesāas well as its partnerships with other agenciesāto improve their physical and digital security. Through on-site consultations and online guidance, CISA has helped election administrators secure voting infrastructure against hackers, harden polling places against active shooters, and create polling-place backup plans to deal with ballot shortages or power outages.
Election supervisors have always struggled to overcome serious funding challenges, but in recent years, their jobs have become even more stressful as intense voter scrutiny has given way toĀ harassmentĀ and evenĀ death threats. Election officials of both parties have repeatedly praised CISA for its apolitical support of their work, saying the agencyās recommendations and free security services have been critical in boosting their own efforts.
But that bipartisan accord began fraying after the 2020 election, as some conservative election officialsĀ started criticizing the agencyĀ for its focus on mis- and disinformation. Congressional Republicans joined the fray as well,Ā calling CISAĀ āthe nerve center of the federal governmentās domestic surveillance and censorship operations on social media.ā Their rhetoric echoedĀ Trumpās own history of election denialism, which involved false claims of rigged voting machines and mass voter fraud and culminated in Trump supportersā January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.
With conservativesĀ pushing to axeĀ CISAās election security mission, Trumpās election last November virtually guaranteedĀ an end to that program, and employees have beenĀ bracing for retaliationĀ against the people who participated in that work.
Beanās memo indicates that CISAās internal review will cover every agency position related to election security, as well as performance plans for employees involved in that work; all support services provided to the election community; and all election security guidance and publications. Bean wrote that CISA will describe any steps necessary to ācorrect any activities identified as past misconduct by the Federal Government related to censorship of protected speech,ā including eliminating programs or roles.
After CISA completes its review, the agency will submit a report to the White House addressing how it plans to ādeliver a more focused provision of services for elections security activities,ā Bean told employees. The report will focus on three goals: streamlining the election security services that CISA offers to state and local governments, ensuring that its activities align with its new āmandate to refocusā on its core mission, and removing āall personnel, contracts, grants, programs, products, services, and activitiesā that conflict with Trumpās anti-censorship directive or exceed CISAās authorities.
It is unclear if White House officials or DHS secretary Kristi Noem directly ordered Bean to launch the election security investigation or if she independently determined that Trumpās executive order necessitated it. The January 20 directive does instruct the attorney general to work with other agency leaders to investigate Biden-administration activities that are āinconsistentā with Trumpās vow to end online censorship, but it makes no mention of activities prior to Bidenās term, including CISAās 2020 election work.
āEfficiencyā