• kex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    When purchasing isn’t ownership, then piracy isn’t theft.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are probably some teenagers pirating stuff right now who weren’t even alive when this comic was drawn. I’m old.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 days ago

    PSA: Download all your kindle books. Even if you don’t plan on cracking their DRM, you’ll have the option to in the future should you want to.

  • Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Small note: iTunes doesn’t have DRM anymore (since 2009)

    Apple Music (the subscription) has DRM though, but you should never have a collection on a subscription service, because it can go away at any time

    • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Technically you can: if you distribute the comic but don’t give the attribution, you are breaking the terms of the license which is just about the closest thing to “pirating” it that you can do.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        But “breach of license” is so much more lame than “piracy!”*

        *Yes, a lot of piracy is itself breach of license, hush

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      xkcd comics are available under a CC-By-NC 2.5 licence, so you’ve successfully pirated by not including attribution (as long as people can’t tell at a glance that it’s xkcd from the art style or comment thread you posted it to), but to seal the deal, it’d be a crime to sell it.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I couldn’t tell at glance this was from xkcd and am willing to testify to a jury, when’s the court date?

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Support creators though. Especially if the thing you pirate isn’t from a soulless corporation. This is why creators should always have something like a ko-fi or Patreon page. So I can pay them directly if I enjoyed their work.

    • xylogx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I buy a ton of XKCD merch for this very purpose. I support others on Patreon, by buying from their advertisers and by buying their audiobooks on Libro.fm or a physical copy.

      Amazon and other middlemen add nothing, they simply take a cut off the top. They maintain DRM solely to extract an maximum profits and lock in their customers and sellers. It is extortion and should be illegal.

  • Thalfon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Last time I bought audiobooks I got them from Downpour which included DRM-free downloads as either MP3 or M4B files, in addition to listening through the website or app. I believe Libro.fm may also offer this. Most of my ebooks are through Kobo and are DRM free as well.

    Does depend in some cases on the publisher.

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I buy most of my music from Qobuz or Bandcamp. Perfectly DRM-free with lossless compression, and it’s mine forever.

  • owl@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 minutes ago

    Here is my idea: Everyone makes a private key. When they buy a song they receive the file and a digital signature by the label saying they sold it to your privatepublic key. When you are caught with a bunch of songs, you have to prove ownership using your key. Tadaa provable ownership, no blockchain, You loose the file, but still have the signature? You can download it again and all is good.

    EDIT: Of course, they would sign the public key, sorry.

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        I don’t think so. There nothing non fungible in my idea and nfts require a blockchain.

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      A digital signature from the label would be created with their private key.

      What would they be signing? Your public key plus the ID of the song? They can’t sign your private key, it’s private.

      What stops you sharing your private key and a song with a friend. Then when either of you need to provide proof, you can both show that you have the private key that matches the signed file?

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 minutes ago

        Well they would sign my public key plus ID of the song. I can prove, it is my public key and everyone can verify the song belongs to me.

        You are right, to ensure noone can “share login” so to say, it needs to be tied to you personally. That would deny privacy sadly.

        EDIT: Didn’t notice I wrote the wrong thing, thanks for notifying me.

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        In this construct the key is the thing, that signifies the owner. If it’s lost, there is no help. Unless the key is tied to you and an authority can vouch for you.

      • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Well if the record label was still around they could make ownership details public, or let you download the signed file again.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          How would they know the copy legally belongs to you if you lose the key? Would they require some form of ID on top of that?