cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/542998
“It does suck, because everybody kind of makes fun of the Cybertruck. To the outside person, it’s kind of weird, it’s ugly, whatever. Once you actually get in it, drive it, you realize it’s pretty frickin’ cool,” he says. “It’s kind of been sad, because I’ve been trying to prove to people that it’s a really awesome truck that’s not falling apart, and then mine starts to fall apart, so it’s just… Yeah, it’s kind of unfortunate and sad.”
How the hell is that thing legal to sell??
There’s a reason why Musk is paying to dismantle the government.
It’s not over here in the UK. They’re not road legal.
There’s a reason why the EU won’t allow the sale of cybertrucks and it all has to do with
build quality andsafety.Edit: strikethrough added based on incorrect assumption as pointed out below
I thought it was purely due to inadequate rounding of angles on the body due to stricter pedestrian safety laws that the EU has. Does the EU have some kind of build quality testing and standard that the cybertruck failed?
I actually didn’t quite remember the reason, so I checked it. The rounding is one main reason and the fact it is so heavy it requires a drivers license for trucks, as well as basically no demand. So no build quality requirements failed, but definitely safety related.
There’s no consumer protection agency anymore. I wonder why.
I worked at the Tesla plant in Fremont for a bit and most of every car is held together with adhesive. They claim it’s super strong and once heated, it’s stronger than welding… But, I mean… They are still falling apart and I don’t know if that’s because the adhesive sucks or if it’s because every single day, they had to have someone remind everyone that the glue pattern posted at every station where it’s applied isn’t just a suggestion, it’s an engineering requirement for the structural integrity of the part. People were just slapping the adhesive onto shit in any old way they pleased a lot of the time.
Essentially every car has a windshield and trim attached only by adhesive, and has for decades. This ought to be a solved problem.
Is that trim piece steel? Maybe something about the material, usually they’re gluing on plastic trim pieces. They’re relying on heated adhesive but it’s a long skinny piece made of a material that conducts heat?
Yeah, used properly, adhesive can be stronger than just about any other form of fastening. Properly is the key word. Contaminates, or improperly prepped surface will drastically reduce the effectiveness.
Hell, surface coatings to protect against rust are a multi-billion industry and they often require very specific application methods and even a little deviation can fuck up the bond.
(X) to doubt
In other words, the things were being designed by underqualified engineers who didn’t understand factors of safety, design for manufacturability, or that precision comes at a cost.
I suspect the real issue is the workers aren’t given enough time on the line to do this correctly so they just churn them out to hit the needed metric knowing it will fail after being delivered to the owner.
Hence,
That cost could be needing to use precision robot arms instead of humans, needing to pay higher salaries to find really skilled and diligent humans, or as you suggested, slowing down the assembly line so the workers have time to be more careful.
Adhesive binding can be significantly stronger than mechanical bonding when done right.
…when done right. Yeah. Guess where I’m putting my money.
Odds the pace of the line is too fast to do it right?
Adhesives are used everywhere on cars, especially on trim pieces. But you have to prep the parts, which could mean sanding and scuffing, cleaning with solvents, or even (on larger parts) flame or plasma treatment.
Cuz 'Murica!
What. The. Fuck…
Are we taking lessons from Samsung now? I mean are they serious? Adhesive for car parts?!
Well gee, as long as car exteriors don’t experience extreme heating/cooling cycles on a daily basis, then adhesive should work just fine. Oh wait.
It’s like they wanted this vehicle to fail.
Adhesive is fairly common in cars now. Some higher end cars are held together almost entirely with adhesives that bond carbon tubs to the frame.
More info here
That being said, they’re obviously not using it correctly or in the right circumstances on the cybercuck. What a piece of shit.
industrial adhesive exists and is pretty strong.
I still wouldn’t use it on a car.
It’s probably been used on every car since 2000.
I’m sure it is but I haven’t found any holding on body panels.
Front and rear windscreens are bonded on. Rear view mirrors are typically bonded to the glass. Side view mirrors are bonded to their mounts. The Lotus Elise famouslu used bonding and riveting in the chassis. If you doubt the strength of bonding material together, the heat shield panels for the Space Shuttle were bonded with a special epoxy onto the vehicle. The adhesive handled supersonic winds at extreme temperature fluctuations. The glass fascia on skyscrapers is basically held on with double-sided foam backed tape, and it stands up to rain, shine, cold, hot and hurricane winds.
They should have used dutch tape instead.
I’m giggling imagining the Dutch localized Duck brand duct tape where the duck is wearing clogs.
There’s nothing wrong with adhesive. My car window shade things are attached via adhesive.
However, if it is not an extra attachment, shouldn’t they be clipped in somehow?