• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’d suggest returning some of that space back to nature if possible and designating it as a protected zone.

    • Beastimus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In places where the golf is on the edges of cities, absolutely. It just depends on where the course is and what’s surrounding it. Obviously not all courses are in places where all (or even most) uses make sense. I feel there’s a lot of debate here on what exactly the best use to replace golf with would be, and the answer is always that it depends on location and surrounding context. I think the vast majority of us agree that golf is a waste of space, energy, and water, which serves an almost entirely exclusionary function, and all most of us disagree on is what the best use is to replace it.

      Since before we use it for other purposes we need to reclaim it from golf, I think almost everyone in this thread agrees on all policies (about this matter) relevant for essentially the entirety of the foreseeable future, which I think sometimes gets lost in this conversation (and others.)