Update was from 3 days ago, I’m really hopeful ladybird could be a future browser option to help break the stranglehold chrome has over the market, while Mozilla is struggling to find meaningful direction.

It seems like an exciting project with monthly progress updates :) they keep chipping away at compatibility.

  • Patch@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m not sure I really understand the point of this. Even if you hate Mozilla, the Gecko engine is excellent and it would make far more sense to fork it than to start a new one from scratch.

    Building and maintaining a browser engine is hard. FOSS means that everyone is of course free to pursue the projects that interest them, but this doesn’t seem like a great use of effort to me.

    • Cris@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      While I do think the point about forking is true, it is worth acknowledging that the gecko engine is
      a) very behind other browsers in terms of implemented functionality and standards, and
      b) I’ve seen devs say on multiple occasions that because of the wide range of platforms it has officially supported over time (or other reasons), the codebase has become very hard to work with and apparently it’s really hard to add new standards to it

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        That second point sounds interesting, do you remember any names or other sources I could look into?

        • Cris@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Sorry for the late reply, I wish I had more but I think the only specific time I can remember is this comment on a video discussing Firefox’s issues (its a pretty good video, even if I don’t agree with every take in it)

          https://youtube.com/watch?v=mmjUlFIaNLE&lc=Ugxh4SDBv3MmwdHyb7h4AaABAg

          Edit: wasn’t sure if the link would open the comment correctly so I figured I’d take a screenshot

          Its one of the top comments and its loved by the video creator so it shouldn’t be hard to find if the link doesn’t work right

          • mke@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            No need to apologize, I’ll take a late reply over nothing any day. I’m not the fastest replier, myself. That said, I’m sorry, but isn’t that the guy that calls everyone stupid, delusional, and entitled when people (often) point out his mistakes?

            I honestly appreciate the comment from a Firefox dev, believing in good faith that it’s truthful—such insights are often hidden, strewn over comments, old IRC messages, etc.—but I’m definitely wary of taking anything that creator says at face-value. Tech-influencers may have been a mistake.

            …Well, I’ll give it a shot anyway, since you say there’s value in it. Thank you.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Really why don’t they hard fork chromium/gecko and relicence it and maintain that under completely different name instead of making entirely different engine?