doopinglouie@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGoogle Photos will no longer sync with third-party digital photo frameswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1323arrow-down15cross-posted to: antitrust@lemmy.mlgoogle@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1318arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Photos will no longer sync with third-party digital photo frameswww.theverge.comdoopinglouie@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square43fedilinkcross-posted to: antitrust@lemmy.mlgoogle@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-squarelka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 day agoThis is one of the few things I can get behind with machine learning. Locally run, doesn’t “phone home”, just analyzes faces and categorizes them. That’s it.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoThat’s great when your photos have faces. Mine mostly don’t. Also they don’t come from my phone. So Google is also fairly useless.
minus-squarethe_weezlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·23 hours agoIt also works on simple objects, not as good as Google yet but good enough for me. I can search for keyboard or bicycle and find pictures that way.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoThat’s good to know. I’m using digikam, but I’m always interested in options
This is one of the few things I can get behind with machine learning. Locally run, doesn’t “phone home”, just analyzes faces and categorizes them. That’s it.
That’s great when your photos have faces. Mine mostly don’t. Also they don’t come from my phone. So Google is also fairly useless.
It also works on simple objects, not as good as Google yet but good enough for me. I can search for keyboard or bicycle and find pictures that way.
That’s good to know. I’m using digikam, but I’m always interested in options
That’s fair.