I’ve seen a few articles now that US fighter jets have kill switches in them, so the US could just render them useless for anyone they’ve sold them to.

Is this true? It sounds insane to me, I’ve always assumed that countries that buy these jets have full control over them. It’s a gaping hole in your defence if you don’t.

  • Hjalmar@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not so sure. From a software perspective adding a kill switch is needlessly adding a potential vulnerability. Given that (as many others have said) the planes will need spare parts and software updates anyways I see it as quite unlikely that there would be an kill switch.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      From a software perspective adding a kill switch is needlessly adding a potential vulnerability.

      Of course they would test against all imaginable vulnerabilities. It is a weapon after all.

      And of course they would make all the needed software tests in a safe environment where the switch doesn’t really destroy things.

      need spare parts and software updates

      As I said, no direct profit from the kill switch. But the possibility of indirect profit: for every destroyed weapon, you cannot sell spare parts anymore, but then there is the potential to sell a new weapon later.